The Adjudicatory Audible: The Impact of Social Media on the Punishments of NFL Athletes
Abstract
Under its Collective Bargaining Agreement, the National Football League (NFL) has
the ability to punish players who have been charged with a crime or arrested. Individual
teams have the ability to punish players for off-field conduct, most commonly by releasing
them to free agency; however, their authority is extremely limited. Thus, the power
to discipline players is bestowed overwhelmingly to the commissioner’s office, which
has assigned league discipline to 28.6% of arrests between 2000 and 2014. The severity
of these punishments only increased slightly between 2000 and 2014; however, there
exists a statistically significant, positive relationship between the number of Tweets
about a crime and the severity of punishment of the resulting NFL punishment. Most
disquieting, more-valuable players are punished less severely than less-valuable players,
measured in terms of both better fantasy football rankings and in higher salaries.
The results of this study clearly demonstrate that league punishment of NFL players
is determined by the public response to the crime, and that the commissioner’s office
allows for better players to escape more-severe punishments—or punishments at all—more
frequently than their worse-performing counterparts. An impartial, independent arbiter,
as opposed to an all-powerful commissioner’s office, would more effectively grant
punishments that fit the crime as opposed to the degree of public outrage.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Public Policy StudiesPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11562Citation
Lazarus, Danielle (2016). The Adjudicatory Audible: The Impact of Social Media on the Punishments of NFL Athletes.
Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11562.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info