Do You Want to Hear the Bad News? The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Alzheimer's Disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains difficult. Lack of diagnostic
certainty or possible distress related to a positive result from diagnostic testing
could limit the application of new testing technologies. The objective of this paper
is to quantify respondents' preferences for obtaining AD diagnostic tests and to estimate
the perceived value of AD test information. METHODS: Discrete-choice experiment and
contingent-valuation questions were administered to respondents in Germany and the
United Kingdom. Choice data were analyzed by using random-parameters logit. A probit
model characterized respondents who were not willing to take a test. RESULTS: Most
respondents indicated a positive value for AD diagnostic test information. Respondents
who indicated an interest in testing preferred brain imaging without the use of radioactive
markers. German respondents had relatively lower money-equivalent values for test
features compared with respondents in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents
preferred less invasive diagnostic procedures and tests with higher accuracy and expressed
a willingness to pay up to €700 to receive a less invasive test with the highest accuracy.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)diagnostic test information
discrete-choice experiment (DCE)
money-equivalent value (MEV)
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
Choice Behavior
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Germany
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Preference
Radiation Exposure
Socioeconomic Factors
United Kingdom
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11717Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.011Publication Info
Mühlbacher, Axel; Johnson, F Reed; Yang, Jui-Chen; Happich, Michael; & Belger, Mark (2016). Do You Want to Hear the Bad News? The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Alzheimer's Disease.
Value Health, 19(1). pp. 66-74. 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.011. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11717.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
F. Reed Johnson
Professor in Population Health Sciences
F. Reed Johnson, PhD, has more than 40 years of academic and research experience in
health and environmental economics. He has served on the faculties of several universities
in the United States, Canada, and Sweden, and as Distinguished Fellow at Research
Triangle Institute. He currently is Senior Research Scholar in the Duke Clinical Research
Institute. As a staff member in the US Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental
economics research program during the 1980s, Reed helped

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info