Validation of the Food-Linked Virtual Response task.
Abstract
This research validates a computerized dietary selection task (Food-Linked Virtual
Response or FLVR) for use in studies of food consumption. In two studies, FLVR task
responses were compared with measures of health consciousness, mood, body mass index,
personality, cognitive restraint toward food, and actual food selections from a buffet
table. The FLVR task was associated with variables which typically predict healthy
decision-making and was unrelated to mood or body mass index. Furthermore, the FLVR
task predicted participants' unhealthy selections from the buffet, but not overall
amount of food. The FLVR task is an inexpensive, valid, and easily administered option
for assessing momentary dietary decisions.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11795Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1177/1359105315595452Publication Info
Pascoe, Elizabeth A; Richman, Laura Smart; & Kort, Daniel (2015). Validation of the Food-Linked Virtual Response task. J Health Psychol. 10.1177/1359105315595452. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11795.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Laura Smart Richman
Adjunct Professor in the Department of Population Health Sciences
Dr. Richman's research broadly focuses on understanding factors that contribute to
health disparities for disadvantaged groups. Some research areas include the role
of social status, gentrification, and social network characteristics on health behaviors
and outcomes. Click here for .pdf links to my publicationsAreas of expertise: Health

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info