Analysis of Materiality Assessment Methods
Date
2016-04-14
Author
Advisor
Gallagher, Deborah Rigling
Repository Usage Stats
348
views
views
5,433
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Companies must determine what environmental sustainability information should be (and
should not be) reported in their Corporate Sustainability Reports. One way to do this
is to perform a materiality assessment of the sustainability information. Materiality
assessments identify and prioritize information that matters to stakeholders and to
the company. A company may be mandated to perform a materiality assessment by a regulation
or directive. Some voluntary sustainability reporting frameworks require a materiality
assessment. Companies may also choose to perform a materiality assessment to efficiently
allocate resources. The problem is that there is no universal definition of materiality
for sustainability information, and there are multiple ways to perform an assessment.
Companies are challenged with selecting an appropriate method. This Masters Project
reviews five methods for identifying and prioritizing material sustainability information.
Sustainability materiality assessments performed by large manufacturing firms were
examined. Recommendations were made for a specific client as to how they should perform
a materiality assessment of their own sustainability information.
Type
Master's projectSubject
SustainabilityMateriality
Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Global Reporting Initiative
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11818Citation
Phelps, Danyelle Lynne (2016). Analysis of Materiality Assessment Methods. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11818.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info