dc.contributor.author |
Kohrt, Brandon A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Luitel, Nagendra P |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acharya, Prakash |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jordans, Mark JD |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
England |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-06-01T19:35:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-03-08 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951403 |
|
dc.identifier |
10.1186/s12888-016-0768-y |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12069 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND: Despite recognition of the burden of disease due to mood disorders in
low- and middle-income countries, there is a lack of consensus on best practices for
detecting depression. Self-report screening tools, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire
(PHQ-9), require modification for low literacy populations and to assure cultural
and clinical validity. An alternative approach is to employ idioms of distress that
are locally salient, but these are not synonymous with psychiatric categories. Therefore,
our objectives were to evaluate the validity of the PHQ-9, assess the added value
of using idioms of distress, and develop an algorithm for depression detection in
primary care. METHODS: We conducted a transcultural translation of the PHQ-9 in Nepal
using qualitative methods to achieve semantic, content, technical, and criterion equivalence.
Researchers administered the Nepali PHQ-9 to randomly selected patients in a rural
primary health care center. Trained psychosocial counselors administered a validated
Nepali depression module of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
to validate the Nepali PHQ-9. Patients were also assessed for local idioms of distress
including heart-mind problems (Nepali, manko samasya). RESULTS: Among 125 primary
care patients, 17 (14 %) were positive for a major depressive episode in the prior
2 weeks based on CIDI administration. With a Nepali PHQ-9 cutoff ≥ 10: sensitivity
= 0.94, specificity = 0.80, positive predictive value (PPV) =0.42, negative predictive
value (NPV) =0.99, positive likelihood ratio = 4.62, and negative likelihood ratio
= 0.07. For heart-mind problems: sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.27, PPV = 0.17,
NPV = 0.97. With an algorithm comprising two screening questions (1. presence of heart-mind
problems and 2. function impairment due to heart-mind problems) to determine who should
receive the full PHQ-9, the number of patients requiring administration of the PHQ-9
could be reduced by 50 %, PHQ-9 false positives would be reduced by 18 %, and 88 %
of patients with depression would be correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Combining idioms
of distress with a transculturally-translated depression screener increases efficiency
and maintains accuracy for high levels of detection. The algorithm reduces the time
needed for primary healthcare staff to verbally administer the tool for patients with
limited literacy. The burden of false positives is comparable to rates in high-income
countries and is a limitation for universal primary care screening.
|
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
BMC Psychiatry |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1186/s12888-016-0768-y |
|
dc.subject |
Adult |
|
dc.subject |
Culture |
|
dc.subject |
Depressive Disorder, Major |
|
dc.subject |
Female |
|
dc.subject |
Humans |
|
dc.subject |
Male |
|
dc.subject |
Mass Screening |
|
dc.subject |
Nepal |
|
dc.subject |
Poverty |
|
dc.subject |
Primary Health Care |
|
dc.subject |
Reproducibility of Results |
|
dc.subject |
Self Report |
|
dc.subject |
Sensitivity and Specificity |
|
dc.subject |
Surveys and Questionnaires |
|
dc.subject |
Translating |
|
dc.title |
Detection of depression in low resource settings: validation of the Patient Health
Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and cultural concepts of distress in Nepal.
|
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Kohrt, Brandon A|0598618 |
|
pubs.author-url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951403 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
58 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Clinical Science Departments |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Cultural Anthropology |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Global Health Institute |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Institutes and Provost's Academic Units |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Social and Community Psychiatry |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
School of Medicine |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Trinity College of Arts & Sciences |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University Institutes and Centers |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published online |
|
pubs.volume |
16 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
1471-244X |
|