ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Reduction in urinary arsenic levels in response to arsenic mitigation efforts in Araihazar, Bangladesh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify and evaluate an effective mitigation program
for arsenic exposure from drinking water in Bangladesh. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the
effectiveness of a multifaceted mitigation program to reduce As exposure among 11,746
individuals in a prospective cohort study initiated in 2000 in Araihazar, Bangladesh,
by interviewing participants and measuring changes in urinary As levels. METHODS:
The interventions included a) person-to-person reporting of well test results and
health education; b) well labeling and village-level health education; and c) installations
of 50 deep, low-As community wells in villages with the highest As exposure. RESULTS:
Two years after these interventions, 58% of the 6,512 participants with unsafe wells
(As >/=50 microg) at baseline had responded by switching to other wells. Well labeling
and village-level health education was positively related to switching to safe wells
(As < 50 mug/L) among participants with unsafe wells [rate ratio (RR) = 1.84; 95%
confidence interval (CI), 1.60-2.11] and inversely related to any well switching among
those with safe wells (RR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98). The urinary As level in participants
who switched to a well identified as safe (< 50 microg As/L) dropped from an average
of 375 microg As/g creatinine to 200 microg As/g creatinine, a 46% reduction toward
the average urinary As content of 136 microg As/g creatinine for participants that
used safe wells throughout. Urinary As reduction was positively related to educational
attainment, body mass index, never-smoking, absence of skin lesions, and time since
switching (p for trend < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that testing of wells
and informing households of the consequences of As exposure, combined with installation
of deep community wells where most needed, can effectively address the continuing
public health emergency from arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh.
Type
Journal articleSubject
AdolescentAdult
Aged
Arsenic
Arsenic Poisoning
Bangladesh
Environmental Exposure
Female
Health Education
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Water Pollutants, Chemical
Water Supply
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12706Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1289/ehp.9833Publication Info
Chen, Yu; van Geen, Alexander; Graziano, Joseph H; Pfaff, Alexander; Madajewicz, Malgosia;
Parvez, Faruque; ... Ahsan, Habibul (2007). Reduction in urinary arsenic levels in response to arsenic mitigation efforts in Araihazar,
Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect, 115(6). pp. 917-923. 10.1289/ehp.9833. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12706.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Alexander Pfaff
Professor in the Sanford School of Public Policy
Alex Pfaff is a Professor of Public Policy, Economics and Environment at Duke University.
He studies how economic development affects and is affected by natural resources and
the environment. His focus is on the impacts of conservation policies (such as protected
areas, ecoservices payments, and certifications) and development policies (such as
roads and rights). Those impacts are functions of choices by individuals and communities
that affect land use, water quantity and quality, human exposure

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info