Modeling the evolution of expectations and uncertainty in general equilibrium
Abstract
© 2016 by the Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka
University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.We develop methods
to solve general equilibrium models in which forward-looking agents are subject to
waves of pessimism, optimism, and uncertainty that turn out to critically affect macroeconomic
outcomes. Agents in the model are fully rational and conduct Bayesian learning, and
they know that they do not know. Therefore, agents take into account that their beliefs
will evolve according to what they will observe. This framework accommodates both
gradual and abrupt changes in beliefs and allows for an analytical characterization
of uncertainty. We use a prototypical Real Business Cycle model to illustrate the
methods.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13126Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/iere.12174Publication Info
Bianchi, F; & Melosi, L (2016). Modeling the evolution of expectations and uncertainty in general equilibrium. International Economic Review, 57(2). pp. 717-756. 10.1111/iere.12174. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13126.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Francesco Bianchi
Professor of Economics
Currently, Bianchi’s main research interests involve the role of agents’ beliefs in
explaining changes in the reduced form properties of the macroeconomy. Bianchi has
also done work on the interaction between the real economy and the term structure
of interest rates and on the role of rare events in shaping agents’ expectations.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info