Show simple item record

The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes.

dc.contributor.author Akpalu, W
dc.contributor.author Anderson, CM
dc.contributor.author Anderson, JL
dc.contributor.author Anggraeni, D
dc.contributor.author Arthur, R
dc.contributor.author Asche, Frank
dc.contributor.author Chu, J
dc.contributor.author Eggert, H
dc.contributor.author Flores, J
dc.contributor.author Freeman, MA
dc.contributor.author Guttormsen, Atle G
dc.contributor.author Holland, DS
dc.contributor.author Knapp, G
dc.contributor.author Kobayashi, M
dc.contributor.author Larkin, S
dc.contributor.author MacLauchlin, K
dc.contributor.author McCluney, JK
dc.contributor.author Meredith, J
dc.contributor.author Schnier, K
dc.contributor.author Smith, Martin D
dc.contributor.author Soboil, M
dc.contributor.author Sylvia, G
dc.contributor.author Tveterås, S
dc.contributor.author Uchida, H
dc.contributor.author Valderrama, D
dc.contributor.author Ward, T
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-21T22:41:21Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946194
dc.identifier PONE-D-14-37986
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10161/13501
dc.description.abstract Pursuit of the triple bottom line of economic, community and ecological sustainability has increased the complexity of fishery management; fisheries assessments require new types of data and analysis to guide science-based policy in addition to traditional biological information and modeling. We introduce the Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs), a broadly applicable and flexible tool for assessing performance in individual fisheries, and for establishing cross-sectional links between enabling conditions, management strategies and triple bottom line outcomes. Conceptually separating measures of performance, the FPIs use 68 individual outcome metrics--coded on a 1 to 5 scale based on expert assessment to facilitate application to data poor fisheries and sectors--that can be partitioned into sector-based or triple-bottom-line sustainability-based interpretative indicators. Variation among outcomes is explained with 54 similarly structured metrics of inputs, management approaches and enabling conditions. Using 61 initial fishery case studies drawn from industrial and developing countries around the world, we demonstrate the inferential importance of tracking economic and community outcomes, in addition to resource status.
dc.language eng
dc.relation.ispartof PLoS One
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1371/journal.pone.0122809
dc.subject Fisheries
dc.subject Total Quality Management
dc.title The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes.
dc.type Journal article
pubs.author-url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946194
pubs.begin-page e0122809
pubs.issue 5
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Duke Science & Society
pubs.organisational-group Economics
pubs.organisational-group Environmental Sciences and Policy
pubs.organisational-group Initiatives
pubs.organisational-group Institutes and Provost's Academic Units
pubs.organisational-group Nicholas School of the Environment
pubs.organisational-group Trinity College of Arts & Sciences
pubs.publication-status Published online
pubs.volume 10
dc.identifier.eissn 1932-6203


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record