ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Improved Visual Cognition through Stroboscopic Training.
Abstract
Humans have a remarkable capacity to learn and adapt, but surprisingly little research
has demonstrated generalized learning in which new skills and strategies can be used
flexibly across a range of tasks and contexts. In the present work we examined whether
generalized learning could result from visual-motor training under stroboscopic visual
conditions. Individuals were assigned to either an experimental condition that trained
with stroboscopic eyewear or to a control condition that underwent identical training
with non-stroboscopic eyewear. The training consisted of multiple sessions of athletic
activities during which participants performed simple drills such as throwing and
catching. To determine if training led to generalized benefits, we used computerized
measures to assess perceptual and cognitive abilities on a variety of tasks before
and after training. Computer-based assessments included measures of visual sensitivity
(central and peripheral motion coherence thresholds), transient spatial attention
(a useful field of view - dual task paradigm), and sustained attention (multiple-object
tracking). Results revealed that stroboscopic training led to significantly greater
re-test improvement in central visual field motion sensitivity and transient attention
abilities. No training benefits were observed for peripheral motion sensitivity or
peripheral transient attention abilities, nor were benefits seen for sustained attention
during multiple-object tracking. These findings suggest that stroboscopic training
can effectively improve some, but not all aspects of visual perception and attention.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13533Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00276Publication Info
Appelbaum, L Gregory; Schroeder, Julia E; Cain, Matthew S; & Mitroff, Stephen R (2011). Improved Visual Cognition through Stroboscopic Training. Front Psychol, 2. pp. 276. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00276. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13533.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Lawrence Gregory Appelbaum
Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Greg Appelbaum is an Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences in the Duke University School of Medicine. Dr. Appelbaum's research
interests primarily concern the brain mechanisms underlying visual cognition, how
these capabilities differ among individuals, and how they can be improved through
behavioral, neurofeedback, and neuromodulation interventions. Within the field of
cognitive neuroscience, his research has addressed visual pe
Stephen Mitroff
Associate Research Professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience
NOTE: As of 8/1/2015 Dr. Mitroff and his lab will move to The George Washington University
in Washington D.C. Lab focus: My lab has an active interest in visual search—how we
find targets amongst distractors. With a dual goal of informing both academic theory
and applied "real-world" performance, we explore various influences on search. We
work with a variety of expert groups to understand the effects of experience and expertise,
and to reveal individual differences in performa
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info