The Early Emergence of Guilt-Motivated Prosocial Behavior
Abstract
© 2016 The Authors. Child Development © 2016 Society for Research in Child Development,
Inc.Guilt serves vital prosocial functions: It motivates transgressors to make amends,
thus restoring damaged relationships. Previous developmental research on guilt has
not clearly distinguished it from sympathy for a victim or a tendency to repair damage
in general. The authors tested 2- and 3-year-old children (N = 62 and 64, respectively)
in a 2 × 2 design, varying whether or not a mishap caused harm to someone and whether
children themselves caused that mishap. Three-year-olds showed greatest reparative
behavior when they had caused the mishap and it caused harm, thus showing a specific
effect of guilt. Two-year-olds repaired more whenever harm was caused, no matter by
whom, thus showing only an effect of sympathy. Guilt as a distinct motivator of prosocial
behavior thus emerges by at least 3 years.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13637Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/cdev.12628Publication Info
Vaish, Amrisha; Carpenter, Malinda; & Tomasello, Michael (2016). The Early Emergence of Guilt-Motivated Prosocial Behavior. Child Development, 87(6). pp. 1772-1782. 10.1111/cdev.12628. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13637.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Michael Tomasello
James F. Bonk Distinguished Professor
Major research interests in processes of social cognition, social learning, cooperation,
and communication from developmental, comparative, and cultural perspectives. Current
theoretical focus on processes of shared intentionality. Empirical research mainly
with human children from 1 to 4 years of age and great apes.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info