ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Nuclear Reprocessing in the United States: A Levelized Cost Analysis
Date
2009-08-28
Author
Advisor
Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia
Repository Usage Stats
1,013
views
views
2,719
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Although most national policies require the long term storage of spent nuclear fuel,
no geologic repository currently exists for this purpose. The United States government
assumed the task of finding appropriate storage options for spent nuclear fuel more
than twenty years ago. Billions of dollars have been invested into creating the federal
repository at Yucca Mountain, yet it currently remains unclear if the facility will
ever open. Some nations have begun reprocessing spent fuel inventories as a way to
manage waste streams and secure energy supply. Considerable effort has been devoted
toward the development of advanced reprocessing technologies that can reduce the volume
of radioactive materials needing storage, while also generating electricity. Investment
in deployment of such technologies will only be possible if the costs and risks associated
with reprocessing can compete with alternative options.
In order to analyze the economics of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, the Cost of
Electricity (COE) of this and other competing technologies was calculated. This evaluation
allowed the identification of conditions that make reprocessing technologies competitive
under different assumptions regarding uranium price, spent fuel storage cost, and
cost of carbon emissions. Based on capital and annual cost estimates from a number
of sources, new nuclear plants are economically competitive with new coal plants when
carbon emissions assume a cost of $27 per ton. Reprocessing spent fuel only becomes
competitive with direct disposal if uranium prices experience significant increases
between $184 and $280 per kilogram. If uranium prices remain at current levels, spent
fuel storage costs would need to increase from $400 per kilogram to almost $1000 per
kilogram for reprocessing one additional time in a thermal reactor to have viability.
Storage costs would need to exceed $2,500 per kilogram for reprocessing in a closed
fuel cycle to have economic advantage.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/1370Citation
Grubert, Denise (2009). Nuclear Reprocessing in the United States: A Levelized Cost Analysis. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/1370.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info