ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Evaluation of in-hospital management for febrile illness in Northern Tanzania before and after 2010 World Health Organization Guidelines for the treatment of malaria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) published updated guidelines
emphasizing and expanding recommendations for a parasitological confirmation of malaria
before treating with antimalarials. This study aimed to assess differences in historic
(2007-2008) (cohort 1) and recent (2011-2012) (cohort 2) hospital cohorts in the diagnosis
and treatment of febrile illness in a low malaria prevalence area of northern Tanzania.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from two prospective cohort studies that enrolled
febrile adolescents and adults aged ≥13 years. All patients received quality-controlled
aerobic blood cultures and malaria smears. We compared patients' discharge diagnoses,
treatments, and outcomes to assess changes in the treatment of malaria and bacterial
infections. RESULTS: In total, 595 febrile inpatients were enrolled from two referral
hospitals in Moshi, Tanzania. Laboratory-confirmed malaria was detected in 13 (3.2%)
of 402 patients in cohort 1 and 1 (0.5%) of 193 patients in cohort 2 (p = 0.041).
Antimalarials were prescribed to 201 (51.7%) of 389 smear-negative patients in cohort
1 and 97 (50.5%) of 192 smear-negative patients in cohort 2 (p = 0.794). Bacteremia
was diagnosed from standard blood culture in 58 (14.5%) of 401 patients in cohort
1 compared to 18 (9.5%) of 190 patients in cohort 2 (p = 0.091). In cohort 1, 40 (69.0%)
of 58 patients with a positive blood culture received antibacterials compared to 16
(88.9%) of 18 patients in cohort 2 (p = 0.094). In cohort 1, 43 (10.8%) of the 399
patients with known outcomes died during hospitalization compared with 12 (6.2%) deaths
among 193 patients in cohort 2 (p = 0.073). DISCUSSION: In a setting of low malaria
transmission, a high proportion of smear-negative patients were diagnosed with malaria
and treated with antimalarials despite updated WHO guidelines on malaria treatment.
Improved laboratory diagnostics for non-malaria febrile illness might help to curb
this practice.
Type
Journal articleSubject
AdolescentAdult
Antimalarials
Cohort Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Fever
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Malaria
Prospective Studies
Tanzania
Treatment Outcome
World Health Organization
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13775Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1371/journal.pone.0089814Publication Info
Moon, Andrew M; Biggs, Holly M; Rubach, Matthew P; Crump, John A; Maro, Venace P;
Saganda, Wilbrod; & Reddy, Elizabeth A (2014). Evaluation of in-hospital management for febrile illness in Northern Tanzania before
and after 2010 World Health Organization Guidelines for the treatment of malaria.
PLoS One, 9(2). pp. e89814. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089814. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13775.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
John Andrew Crump
Adjunct Professor in the Department of Medicine
I am based in northern Tanzania where I am Site Leader for Duke University’s
collaborative research program based at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre and Director
of Tanzania Operations for the Duke Global Health Institute. I oversee the design
and implementation of research studies on infectious diseases, particularly febrile
illness, invasive bacterial disease, HIV-associated opportunistic infections, clinical
trials of antiretroviral therapy and prevention of mother-to-child tr
Matthew P. Rubach
Associate Professor of Medicine
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info