ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Individual differences in regulatory focus predict neural response to reward.
Abstract
Although goal pursuit is related to both functioning of the brain's reward circuits
and psychological factors, the literatures surrounding these concepts have often been
separate. Here, we use the psychological construct of regulatory focus to investigate
individual differences in neural response to reward. Regulatory focus theory proposes
two motivational orientations for personal goal pursuit: (1) promotion, associated
with sensitivity to potential gain, and (2) prevention, associated with sensitivity
to potential loss. The monetary incentive delay task was used to manipulate reward
circuit function, along with instructional framing corresponding to promotion and
prevention in a within-subject design. We observed that the more promotion oriented
an individual was, the lower their ventral striatum response to gain cues. Follow-up
analyses revealed that greater promotion orientation was associated with decreased
ventral striatum response even to no-value cues, suggesting that promotion orientation
may be associated with relatively hypoactive reward system function. The findings
are also likely to represent an interaction between the cognitive and motivational
characteristics of the promotion system with the task demands. Prevention orientation
did not correlate with ventral striatum response to gain cues, supporting the discriminant
validity of regulatory focus theory. The results highlight a dynamic association between
individual differences in self-regulation and reward system function.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13837Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1080/17470919.2016.1178170Publication Info
Scult, Matthew A; Knodt, Annchen R; Hanson, Jamie L; Ryoo, Minyoung; Adcock, R Alison;
Hariri, Ahmad R; & Strauman, Timothy J (2016). Individual differences in regulatory focus predict neural response to reward. Soc Neurosci. pp. 1-11. 10.1080/17470919.2016.1178170. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13837.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Rachel Alison Adcock
Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Dr. Adcock received her undergraduate degree in psychology from Emory University and
her MD and PhD in Neurobiology from Yale University. She completed her psychiatry
residency training at Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute at UC-San Francisco and
did neurosciences research as a postdoctoral fellow at UC-SF, the San Francisco VA
Medical Center, and Stanford before joining the Duke faculty in 2007. Her work has
been funded by NIDA, NIMH, NSF and Alfred P. Sloan and Klingenstein Fellows
Ahmad Hariri
Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
Integrating psychology, neuroimaging, pharmacology and molecular genetics in the search
for biological pathways mediating individual differences in behavior and related risk
for psychopathology.
Timothy J. Strauman
Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
FOR POTENTIAL STUDENTS (fall 2024 class):
Dr. Timothy Strauman and Dr. Ann Brewster will be seeking to admit a student for Fall
2024 who will be an important member of their collaborative projects. Dr. Brewster
is an intervention scientist and a faculty member in Duke’s Social Science Research
Institute. The collaborative projects focus on creating, testing, and implementing
school-based therapeutic and preventive interventions for adolescents at risk for
negative academic and me
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info