Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Objective Subjects, Empirical Identities: Psychology’s Measurement of Ethnic Identity and Critical Race and Ethnicity Theory

    Thumbnail
    View / Download
    818.2 Kb
    Date
    2017-04-10
    Author
    Acosta, Jennifer
    Advisor
    Viego, Antonio
    Repository Usage Stats
    261
    views
    274
    downloads
    Abstract
    Objective Subjects, Empirical Identities explores the kinds of questions that emerge when psychology’s conceptualization of ethnic identity comes into contact with critical race and ethnicity theory. Jean S. Phinney’s Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM), for example, conceptualizes ethnic identity as a construct that can be reduced to its supposedly constituent pieces, operationalized into variables for the purpose of quantitative assessment in studies. In The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Rey Chow, a prominent critical race and ethnicity scholar, argues that, through a process called coercive mimeticism, ethnic subjects are coerced into mimicking characteristics that are recognizably ethnic (i.e., stereotypes viewed as “inherent to” ethnic subjects). By placing Chow in conversation with Phinney, this project asks: What might it look like to bring in thinking from critical race and ethnicity theory and apply it to psychology’s understanding of ethnic identity? Can these two fields be made to speak to each other, or are they so inherently ideologically and methodologically incompatible that any attempt to do so would prove futile? In working through these questions, I argue that: 1) There is a problem with how ethnic identity is conceptualized in quantitative psychological research, specifically in its lack of sociocultural and historical texture; 2) There is a need to recognize the constructed nature of the terms and concepts psychologists use in their work and apply critical perspectives to the theory and methodology used in these fields; and 3) There is a need for reflexivity on the part of researchers such that they acknowledge that they, and the work that they produce, are products of a particular historical moment. Ultimately, I contend that mainstream psychology has what critical psychologist Thomas Teo refers to as a “hermeneutic deficit,” a limitation resulting from the unacknowledged speculative and ideological interpretations made in (and made invisible by) empirical research. I call for researchers and scholars in mainstream psychology to learn from critical psychologists by practicing reflexivity and engaging in the critical reflection of the work that they produce. Psychology researchers, I conclude, have an ethical responsibility to be transparent about the hermeneutic deficit in our work.
    Type
    Honors thesis
    Department
    Literature
    Subject
    Ethnic and racial identity
    critical race and ethnicity theory
    quantitative methodology
    epistemology
    critical psychology
    Latino Studies
    Permalink
    https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13973
    Citation
    Acosta, Jennifer (2017). Objective Subjects, Empirical Identities: Psychology’s Measurement of Ethnic Identity and Critical Race and Ethnicity Theory. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13973.
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
    More Info
    Show full item record
    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

    Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers

     

     

    Search Scope

    Browse

    All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics