Cooperation and Clearance: Victim Cooperation in Shooting Crimes
Abstract
This thesis examined the factors affecting police clearance rates and citizen cooperation
in investigations, particularly as they related to shooting crimes in Durham, North
Carolina. Existing literature suggests that victim demographics and crime circumstances
are limiting factors in police investigations and may influence the noncooperation
of victims and witnesses. The study further explored these relationships through the
use of statistical regression analyses of predictive factors for police clearance
and victim cooperation in an examination of investigative case data and a qualitative
analysis of police interview data. A secondary goal of the analysis was to provide
insight and recommendations for reducing noncooperation in police investigations.
Based on an examination of administrative data from the Durham Police Department records
of shooting crimes in 2015, a multivariate logistic regression revealed that crime
circumstances were highly associated with crime clearance. In addition, respondents
who were male, racial and ethnic minorities, or between the ages of 20 and 30 were
more likely to be uncooperative in police investigations. An analysis of semi-structured
interviews with the Durham police department investigators assigned to the cases helped
provide potential explanations for the noncooperation, including the presence of a
pervasive culture of fear and the general mistrust in the police. I consequently proposed
potential recommendations for improving citizen cooperation, such as through the use
of community policing, providing credible relocation services for victims, and expanding
staffing and resource availability.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Public Policy StudiesPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14250Citation
Ho, Jeffrey (2017). Cooperation and Clearance: Victim Cooperation in Shooting Crimes. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14250.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info