Assessing the Injury Tolerance of the Human Spine
Chronic and acute back injuries are widespread, affecting people in environments where they are exposed to vibration and repeated shock. These issues have been widely reported among personnel on aircraft and small watercraft; operators of heavy industrial or construction equipment may also experience morbidity associated with cyclic loading. To prevent these types of injuries, an improved understanding is needed of the spine’s tolerance to fatigue injury and of the factors that affect fatigue tolerance.
These types of vibration and shock exposures are addressed by international standards that propose limitations on the length and severity of the accelerations to which an individual is subjected. However, the current standard, ISO 2631-5:2004, provides an imprecise health hazard assessment. In this dissertation, a detailed technical critique is presented to examine the assumptions on which ISO 2631-5:2004 is based. An original analysis of existing data yields an age-based regression of the ultimate strength of lumbar spinal units and demonstrates sources of error in the strength regression in the standard. This dissertation also demonstrates that, contradicting earlier assumptions, the ultimate strength of the spine does not lie on a power-law S-N curve, and fatigue tolerance cannot be extrapolated from ultimate strength tests.
An alternative approach is presented for estimating the injury risk due to repeated loading. Drawing from existing data in the literature, a large dataset of in vitro fatigue tests of lumbar spinal segments was assembled. Using this fatigue data, a survival analysis approach was used to estimate the risk of failure based on several factors. Number of cycles, load amplitude, sex, and age all were significant predictors of bony failure in the spinal column. The parameter described by ISO 2631-5:2004 to quantify repeated loading exposure was modified, and an injury risk model was developed based on this modified parameter which relates risk of vertebral failure to repeated compressive loading. Notably, the effect of sex on fatigue tolerance persisted after normalizing by area, emphasizing the need for men and women to be addressed separately in the creation of injury risk predictions and occupational guidelines.
Posture has also been implicated in altering the injury mechanisms and tolerance to fatigue loading. However, few previous investigations in cyclic loading have addressed non-neutral postures. To assess the influence of dynamic flexion on the fatigue tolerance of the lumbar spine, a series of tests were conducted which combined a cyclic compressive force with a dynamic flexing motion. A study of 17 spinal segments from six young male cadavers was conducted, with tests ranging from 1000 to 500 000 cycles. Of the 17 specimens, 7 failed during testing. These failures were analyzed using a Cox Proportional Hazards model. As in compressive fatigue behavior, significant factors were the magnitude of the applied load and the age of the specimen. However, when the dynamically flexed specimens in these tests were compared to the specimens in the axial fatigue dataset, the flexion condition did not have a detectable effect on fatigue tolerance.
The Hybrid III dummy is a critical tool the assessment of such loading. Although the Hybrid III was originally designed for automotive frontal impact testing, these dummies have since been used to measure exposures and estimate injury risks of a wide variety of scenarios. These scenarios often involve using the dummy under non-standard temperatures or with little recovery interval between tests. Series of tests were conducted on the Hybrid III neck and lumbar components to assess the effects of rest duration intervals and a range of temperatures. Variations in rest duration intervals had little effect on the response of either component. However, both components were extremely sensitive to changes in temperature. For the 50th percentile male HIII neck, the stiffness fell by 18% between 25°C and 37.5°C; at 0°C, the stiffness more than doubled, increasing by 115%. Temperature variation had an even more pronounced effect on the HIII lumbar. Compared to room temperature, the lumbar stiffness at 37.5°C fell by 40%, and at 12.5°C, the stiffness more than doubled, increasing by 115%.
This dissertation has advanced the state of knowledge about the fatigue characteristics of the spine. An injury risk function has been developed that can serve as a tool for health hazard assessment in occupational standards. It has also contributed a fatigue dataset with dynamic flexion. This work will improve the scientific community’s ability to prevent repeated loading injuries. This dissertation has also demonstrated the immense sensitivity to temperature of the Hybrid III spinal components. This finding has major implications for the interpretation of previously published work using the Hybrid III, for the conduct of future research, and for future dummy design.
Anthropomorphic test device
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Duke Dissertations
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info