ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Stickiness of respondent-driven sampling recruitment chains.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14576Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1017/nws.2014.16Publication Info
Fisher, Jacob C; & Merli, M Giovanna (2017). Stickiness of respondent-driven sampling recruitment chains. Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press), 2(2). pp. 298-301. 10.1017/nws.2014.16. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14576.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Jacob Fisher
Affiliate
Statistics "Boot Camp" syllabi:
- 2011, 2012, 2013
Conference presentations:
- Sunbelt 2012 poster
- <a href="http://analytics.ncsu.edu/sesug/2012/
M. Giovanna Merli
Professor in the Sanford School of Public Policy
My research straddles three disciplinary realms: demography, contemporary Chinese
society and global health. I focus on a range of population and health issues in developing
countries that intersect frontline public policy, such as the role of China's population
control program in lowering fertility preferences and fertility rates in China, the
social and behavioral determinants of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases
and the methodological evaluation and implementation of network-based a
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info