Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships
Repository Usage Stats
© 2014 James W. Vaupel & Trifon I. Missov.Background: Survival models accounting for unobserved heterogeneity (frailty models) play an important role in mortality research, yet there is no article that concisely summarizes useful relationships. Objective: We present a list of important mathematical relationships that govern populations in which individuals differ from each other in unobserved ways. For some relationships we present proofs that, albeit formal, tend to be simple and intuitive. Methods: We organize the article in a progression, starting with general relationships and then turning to models with stronger and stronger assumptions. Results: We start with the general case, in which we do not assume any structure of the underlying baseline hazard, the frailty distribution, or their link to one another. Then we sequentially assume, first, a relative-risk model; second, a gamma distribution for frailty; and, finally, a Gompertz and Gompertz-Makeham specification for baseline mortality. Comments: The article might serve as a handy overall reference to frailty models, especially for mortality research.
Published Version (Please cite this version)10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22
Publication InfoVaupel, James Walton; & Missov, TI (2014). Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships. Demographic Research, 31(1). pp. 659-686. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/14671.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
More InfoShow full item record