ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Diversity of ageing across the tree of life.
Abstract
Evolution drives, and is driven by, demography. A genotype moulds its phenotype's
age patterns of mortality and fertility in an environment; these two patterns in turn
determine the genotype's fitness in that environment. Hence, to understand the evolution
of ageing, age patterns of mortality and reproduction need to be compared for species
across the tree of life. However, few studies have done so and only for a limited
range of taxa. Here we contrast standardized patterns over age for 11 mammals, 12
other vertebrates, 10 invertebrates, 12 vascular plants and a green alga. Although
it has been predicted that evolution should inevitably lead to increasing mortality
and declining fertility with age after maturity, there is great variation among these
species, including increasing, constant, decreasing, humped and bowed trajectories
for both long- and short-lived species. This diversity challenges theoreticians to
develop broader perspectives on the evolution of ageing and empiricists to study the
demography of more species.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14700Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
James Walton Vaupel
Research Professor Emeritus in the Sanford School of Public Policy
This author no longer has a Scholars@Duke profile, so the information shown here reflects
their Duke status at the time this item was deposited.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info