Show simple item record

Physics and Treatment Planning Considerations for Multifocal Radiosurgery and SBRT

dc.contributor.advisor Adamson, Justus
dc.contributor.advisor Oldham, Mark
dc.contributor.author Trager, Michael Adam
dc.date.accessioned 2017-08-16T18:26:00Z
dc.date.available 2017-08-16T18:26:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15236
dc.description.abstract <p>Purpose:</p><p>A new development in linac-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is treatment of multiple targets using single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, dramatically reducing treatment time while maintaining high target conformality and steep dose gradients between targets and surrounding organs at risk (OAR). In VMAT, the gantry rotates around the patient while continuously delivering radiation. Throughout the VMAT arc, the beam is modulated based on an inverse optimization algorithm in order to spare organs at risk. Single isocenter multi-target VMAT has already been implemented for intracranial SRS and is increasingly used for extracranial SBRT treatments. Despite the increasing popularity of this technique, certain inherent clinically meaningful challenges warrant further investigation. Specifically, single isocenter, multifocal SRS and SBRT can result in small volumes targets with a large off-axis distance from the treatment isocenter. Consequently, angular errors in the collimator, patient support assembly (PSA), or gantry could have an increased impact on target coverage, warranting a re-evaluation of routine linear accelerator QA tolerance recommendations in TG-142. Also, questions have arisen regarding the ability of clinical dose calculation algorithms to calculate dose accurately for these cases at large off-axis distances. Specifically, it is questionable whether or not the MLC model used is sophisticated enough to accurately model the dose off axis. This is of concern because the MLC leaves have different dimensions outside of the HD region, but the dosimetric-leaf-gap model used is the same for both regions. Applying the single isocenter technique to extracranial SBRT of oligometastases introduces additional unique challenges that must be addressed. These include greater intra and inter-fractional setup uncertainties, and dosimetric interplay since immobilization is more difficult and internal motion is non-negligible. The purpose of this thesis is to explore these specific physics and treatment planning considerations for single isocenter multi-target intracranial radiosurgery and extracranial SBRT.</p><p>Materials and Methods:</p><p>Intracranial SRS</p><p>For single isocenter multifocal stereotactic radiosurgery, we evaluated potential dose deviations from mechanical errors in PSA, collimator, and gantry angle within the tolerance recommended by TG-142 for radiosurgery machines. Systematic errors in PSA, collimator, and gantry angle were introduced at the recommended tolerance levels into both multifocal SRS plans and traditional single target SRS using dynamic conformal arcs, and the resulting dosimetric effect were quantified within the treatment planning system. In addition, we quantified the accuracy of the treatment planning system dose calculation algorithm for targets located at large off-axis distances with 3D Slicer analysis software. The dose distribution from the treatment planning system was compared to the distribution measured using a high-resolution 3D dosimetry system (PRESAGE®/Optical-CT). Comparisons were made using DVH and gamma analysis (criteria: 2mm/3%, 3mm/3%, and 3mm/5%). DVH comparisons included a shell analysis in which we compared the dose from 2mm within the target to the target’s surface, the surface to 2mm outside the target, and 2mm to 4mm outside the target for both the plan and the dosimeter.</p><p>Extracranial SBRT</p><p>For applying the single isocenter multifocal technique to extracranial oligometastases, we propose a treatment method that addresses intra and inter-fractional motion as well as dosimetric interplay. The developed technique uses a Single Isocenter with Distinct Optimizations (SIDO) in which all Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) fields share an isocenter but each field treats only one target. When necessary, setup uncertainties from rotations and deformations are mitigated by applying a couch translation between VMAT arcs, and interplay is minimized using dynamic conformal arcs (DCAs) as the starting point for inverse optimization. We evaluated this planning technique using relevant dose indices including conformity index, gradient index and modulation factor. </p><p>Results:</p><p>Intracranial SRS</p><p>Induced errors at TG-142 tolerance levels showed the greatest change in multifocal SRS target coverage for collimator and gantry rotations, while minimal change in coverage was noted for errors in PSA rotation. For single isocenter cases, the largest dose discrepancies were a result of 1° errors in the collimator and gantry angles, specifically with respect to the volume of the PTV receiving the prescription dose. These errors caused up to 33% and 18% deviations, respectively, to the volume of the PTV receiving the prescription dose with mean deviations of 5% and 2%, respectively. When the collimator and gantry errors in single isocenter plans were reduced to 0.5°, the discrepancies in the volume of the PTV receiving the prescription dose were reduced to a max value of <5% for the gantry and collimator with mean values of approximately 1%. For 1° errors in DCA plans, however, deviations to the volume of the PTV receiving the prescription dose did not exceed 5% for the collimator, couch, or gantry and similar results were seen in all other dosimetric indices investigated. </p><p>A preliminary analysis of the Eclipse dose calculation algorithm in comparison to actual dose delivered to targets shows agreement with 89.46%, 94.87%, and 96.39% of voxels having a passing gamma index with criteria of 2mm/3%, 3mm/3%, and 3mm/5% respectively (distance from isocenter ranged from 0-10cm). Targets within 8cm of the isocenter showed less than 2% discrepancy between the plan and measurement with respect to the percent of the target receiving the prescription dose. The target at 10cm from the isocenter, however, had a 15% discrepancy between the plan and measurement with respect to the percent of the target receiving the prescription dose and therefore warrants further investigation.</p><p>Extracranial SBRT</p><p>As the distance between targets increases, the probability for requiring a second translation between treatment arcs also increases. Assuming a margin of 5mm and considering six lung and five liver patient cases, a second translational shift would be required 0%, ~10%, and ~25% of the time for target separations of 5cm, 10cm, and 15cm respectively. </p><p>For greater than 3cm separation between targets in extracranial SBRT, SIDO and SIDO with DCA have an average conformity index of 0.862, and 0.864 respectively, which is comparable to the average conformity of traditional multifocal treatment techniques at these target separations of 0.901. When separation between PTVs is less than 3cm, however, traditional single isocenter VMAT has superior conformity with a mean value of 0.875, as opposed to 0.772 and 0.782 for SIDO and SIDO with DCA respectively; and decreasing conformity with decreasing target separation. SIDO with DCA had superior GI over all other planning techniques for almost all cases with a mean value of 7.31 across all target separations. SIDO with DCA even performed better than the DCA technique with a mean GI of 7.43 across all target separations, which was assumed to be the best method for obtaining a desirable GI. SIDO with DCA had a comparable MF to the DCA plans and was closer to 1 than all other planning techniques. The mean MF values across all target separations for SIDO with DCA and DCA were 1.17 and 0.83 respectively.</p><p>Conclusions:</p><p>Intracranial SRS</p><p>Institutions utilizing a single isocenter VMAT technique for multifocal disease should pay careful attention to the angular mechanical tolerances in designing a robust and complete QA program, especially with respect to the collimator and gantry recommended tolerances. We recommend reducing collimator and gantry tolerances from 1.0° to 0.5° to decrease the potential magnitude of deviations between the planning and delivered dose distributions. The PRESAGE®/Optical-CT 3D dosimetry system verified the accuracy of the Eclipse dose calculation algorithm to within 2% for targets located up to 8cm from the isocenter. Further investigation is required for more distal targets, as they did not have sufficient agreement. </p><p>Extracranial SBRT</p><p>A single isocenter approach for SBRT treatment of extracranial oligometastases may be feasible using the proposed SIDO and SIDO with DCA treatment planning techniques. SIDO for extracranial oligometastases allows flexibility to mitigate spatial uncertainties from rotation and deformation, and has comparable dosimetry to traditional VMAT with low modulation when inverse optimization begins with DCAs. These advantages make SIDO beneficial for target separations of greater than 3cm, however, for target separations less than 3cm a traditional single isocenter technique is more appropriate.</p>
dc.subject Oncology
dc.subject Physics
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject Medical Physics
dc.subject Multifocal
dc.subject Radiosurgery
dc.subject SBRT
dc.subject SRS
dc.title Physics and Treatment Planning Considerations for Multifocal Radiosurgery and SBRT
dc.type Master's thesis
dc.department Medical Physics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record