dc.contributor.author |
Flanagan, N |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Richardson, CJ |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-11-01T16:09:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-11-01T16:09:31Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-12-01 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0923-4861 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15723 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Wetland restoration is commonly presented as an important strategy for maintaining
and enhancing the water quality and ecological capital of watershed-scale ecosystems.
Prioritizing restoration sites on the landscape is often a haphazard process based
on widely held, though often untested, assumptions about relationships between watershed
characteristics and water quality. We present a framework to target and prioritize
wetland restoration locations using both regional and watershed-level screening models.
The regression-tree and random forest models presented in this paper identify watershed
variables with the strongest relationships to a given water quality parameter, present
a clear hierarchy of variable importance, and present approximate thresholds in watershed
area where these variables express the greatest impact on water quality. The proportion
of watersheds classified as prior-converted agricultural land was an important predictor
of both ortho and total phosphorus. Fortunately because prior-converted agricultural
lands were historically wetlands, they are often very suitable for wetland restoration.
These sites often have poorly-drained soils requiring artificial drainage to be suitable
for agriculture. These drainage systems become conduits for transporting phosphorus
from agricultural field and to area streams and rivers. Maintaining natural land-cover
within stream buffers is identified as another important predictor of water quality.
This seems to be especially true with regard to NO 3 -NO 2 concentrations. Our model
results support specific management recommendations including: (a) exclusion of agricultural
land-uses from riparian buffers, (b) maintaining or increasing watershed-level wetland-cover
and (c) reducing wetland fragmentation. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
|
|
dc.publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Wetlands Ecology and Management |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1007/s11273-010-9188-9 |
|
dc.title |
A multi-scale approach to prioritize wetland restoration for watershed-level water
quality improvement
|
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Flanagan, N|0147404 |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Richardson, CJ|0097644 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
695 |
|
pubs.end-page |
706 |
|
pubs.issue |
6 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Environmental Sciences and Policy |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Marine Science and Conservation |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Nicholas School of the Environment |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
18 |
|