ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Initiation, Continuation, or Withdrawal of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend continuation or initiation of guideline-directed
medical therapy, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II
receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB), in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced
ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure
Registry, we linked clinical data from 16 052 heart failure with reduced ejection
fraction (ejection fraction ≤40%) patients with Medicare claims data. We divided ACEi/ARB-eligible
patients into 4 categories based on admission and discharge ACEi/ARB use: continued
(reference group), started, discontinued, or not started on therapy. A multivariable
Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association between ACEi/ARB
category and outcomes. Most, 90.5%, were discharged on ACEi/ARB (59.6% continued and
30.9% newly started). Of those discharged without ACEi/ARB, 1.9% were discontinued,
and 7.5% were eligible but not started. Thirty-day mortality was 3.5% for patients
continued and 4.1% for patients started on ACEi/ARB. In contrast, 30-day mortality
was 8.8% for patients discontinued (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] 1.92; 95% CI 1.32-2.81;
P<0.001) and 7.5% for patients not started (HRadj 1.50; 95% CI 1.12-2.00; P=0.006).
The 30-day readmission rate was lowest among patients continued or started on therapy.
One-year mortality was 28.2% for patients continued and 29.7% for patients started
on ACEi/ARB compared to 41.6% for patients discontinued (HRadj 1.35; 95% CI 1.13-1.61;
P<0.001) and 41.7% (HRadj 1.28; 95% CI 1.14-1.43; P<0.001) for patients not started
on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with continuation, withdrawal of ACEi/ARB during
heart failure hospitalization is associated with higher rates of postdischarge mortality
and readmission, even after adjustment for severity of illness.
Type
Journal articleSubject
angiotensin II receptor blockersangiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors
heart failure
outcomes research
quality of care
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15725Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1161/JAHA.116.004675Publication Info
Gilstrap, Lauren G; Fonarow, Gregg C; Desai, Akshay S; Liang, Li; Matsouaka, Roland;
DeVore, Adam D; ... Bhatt, Deepak L (2017). Initiation, Continuation, or Withdrawal of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin
Receptor Blockers and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Reduced
Ejection Fraction. J Am Heart Assoc, 6(2). 10.1161/JAHA.116.004675. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15725.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Adam David DeVore
Associate Professor of Medicine
Adam D. DeVore, MD, MHS
Dr. DeVore is a cardiologist and Associate Professor of Medicine in the Department
of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, at Duke University School of Medicine. His clinical
interests include caring for patients and families with heart failure, including those
with left ventricular assist devices and heart transplants. He is involved in and
leads multiple large studies of patients with heart failure at both Duke University
Medical Center and the
Adrian Felipe Hernandez
Duke Health Cardiology Professor
Roland Albert Matsouaka
Associate Professor of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info