ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Burden in Rural Uganda and Informing Future Interventions
Abstract
This senior thesis seeks to investigate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a rural
region in Uganda and to use insights from field experience and the literature to explore
possible interventions. The thesis research involved a total of 232 participants,
including village residents (142), market workers (50), religious leaders (20), and
village health workers (VHTs) (20). The village sample data are part of a larger longitudinal
study, conducted under the Community Health Collaboration project of the Student Research
Training Program (SRT) at Duke University. Recruitment for the other three cohorts
of market workers, religious leaders, and VHTs began with this current study, conducted
in the summer of 2016. The current study continued the biometric assessments of CVD
risk within the village cohort and extended the testing to market workers. A total
of 192 individuals participated in these three biometric assessments of their body
mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and fasting blood glucose.
In addition, the research team conducted surveys using an interview format with all
four cohorts. The survey assessed demographic information, lifestyle factors, CVD
perceptions, and CVD knowledge, and religious influences on CVD. Overall, the biometric
findings show substantial CVD risk in the village sample and the persistence of risk
for individuals over time, as evidenced by the results from longitudinal, linear mixed-effect
models. Beyond this high, persistent CVD risk for villagers, the market workers had
even higher CVD risk as evidenced by elevated BMI and fasting blood glucose. The elevated
CVD risk for market workers is possibly due to differences in lifestyle factors including
diet and exercise that are associated with urbanization. The survey results show near
unanimous agreement among participants that CVD is a problem in their community. Despite
the overall concern, the findings expose inaccuracies in knowledge about CVD across
all cohorts. Regarding the role of religion, more than 90% of participants across
all cohorts believe that religion can alleviate CVD symptoms. Further questioning
about religion and CVD reflected a broad array of direct and indirect interpretations
of the role of religion. Exploratory regression analyses, which link survey data to
CVD risk indicators, yielded results that have implications for tailoring CVD interventions
to rural Uganda. To further connect the findings to intervention strategies, the discussion
summarizes the method and results of a literature review on possible CVD interventions.
The literature review advances three principal categories of intervention: education,
policy, and programming. For each of these categories, the study findings together
with the literature review provide the basis for recommending three integrative strategy
for CVD intervention: VHT CVD education programs, policy reform to address CVD medication
stock-outs, and religiously-based CVD programs. The strategies have promise for reducing
CVD risk and improving the lives of individuals in rural Uganda.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Program IIPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15964Citation
Benson, Kathryn (2018). Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Burden in Rural Uganda and Informing Future Interventions.
Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15964.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info