Tailoring nutrition therapy to illness and recovery.
Abstract
Without doubt, in medicine as in life, one size does not fit all. We do not administer
the same drug or dose to every patient at all times, so why then would we live under
the illusion that we should give the same nutrition at all times in the continuum
of critical illness? We have long lived under the assumption that critical illness
and trauma lead to a consistent early increase in metabolic/caloric need, the so-called
"hypermetabolism" of critical illness. What if this is incorrect? Recent data indicate
that early underfeeding of calories (trophic feeding) may have benefits and may require
consideration in well-nourished patients. However, we must confront the reality that
currently ICU nutrition delivery worldwide is actually leading to "starvation" of
our patients and is likely a major contributor to poor long-term quality of life outcomes.
To begin to ascertain the actual calorie and protein delivery required for optimal
ICU recovery, an understanding of "starvation" and recovery from starvation and lean
body mass (LBM) loss is needed. To begin to answer this question, we must look to
the landmark Minnesota Starvation Study from 1945. This trial defines much of the
world's knowledge about starvation, and most importantly what is required for recovery
from starvation and massive LBM loss as occurs in the ICU. Recent and historic data
indicate that critical illness is characterized by early massive catabolism, LBM loss,
and escalating hypermetabolism that can persist for months or years. Early enteral
nutrition during the acute phase should attempt to correct micronutrient/vitamin deficiencies,
deliver adequate protein, and moderate nonprotein calories in well-nourished patients,
as in the acute phase they are capable of generating significant endogenous energy.
Post resuscitation, increasing protein (1.5-2.0 g/kg/day) and calories are needed
to attenuate LBM loss and promote recovery. Malnutrition screening is essential and
parenteral nutrition can be safely added following resuscitation when enteral nutrition
is failing based on pre-illness malnutrition and LBM status. Following the ICU stay,
significant protein/calorie delivery for months or years is required to facilitate
functional and LBM recovery, with high-protein oral supplements being essential to
achieve adequate nutrition.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15997Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1186/s13054-017-1906-8Publication Info
Wischmeyer, Paul E (2017). Tailoring nutrition therapy to illness and recovery. Crit Care, 21(Suppl 3). pp. 316. 10.1186/s13054-017-1906-8. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15997.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Paul Edmund Wischmeyer
Professor of Anesthesiology
Paul Wischmeyer M.D., EDIC, FASPEN, FCCM is a critical care, perioperative, and nutrition
physician-researcher who specializes in enhancing preparation and recovery from surgery,
critical care and COVID-19. He serves as a Tenured Professor of Anesthesiology and
Surgery at Duke. He also serves as the Associate Vice Chair for Clinical Research
in the Dept. of Anesthesiology and Director of the TPN/Nutrition Team at Duke. Dr.
Wischmeyer earned his medical degree with honors at T

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info