Dimensional dependence of the Stokes-Einstein relation and its violation
Abstract
We generalize to higher spatial dimensions the Stokes-Einstein relation (SER) as well
as the leading correction to diffusivity in finite systems with periodic boundary
conditions, and validate these results with numerical simulations. We then investigate
the evolution of the high-density SER violation with dimension in simple hard sphere
glass formers. The analysis suggests that this SER violation disappears around dimension
d u = 8, above which it is not observed. The critical exponent associated with the
violation appears to evolve linearly in 8 - d, below d = 8, as predicted by Biroli
and Bouchaud [J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 205101 (2007)], but the linear coefficient
is not consistent with the prediction. The SER violation with d establishes a new
benchmark for theory, and its complete description remains an open problem. © 2013
AIP Publishing LLC.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17096Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1063/1.4825177Publication Info
Charbonneau, Benoit; Charbonneau, Patrick; Jin, Yuliang; Parisi, Giorgio; & Zamponi,
Francesco (2013). Dimensional dependence of the Stokes-Einstein relation and its violation. Journal of Chemical Physics, 139(16). 10.1063/1.4825177. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17096.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Patrick Charbonneau
Professor of Chemistry
Professor Charbonneau studies soft matter. His work combines theory and simulation
to understand the glass problem, protein crystallization, microphase formation, and colloidal
assembly in external fields.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info