Flying Blind? Implementing a Trauma-Informed Care Approach in the Treatment of Trafficking Survivors
Abstract
Millions of people are exploited for labor or sex throughout the world. Governments
and non-profit organizations have increasingly explored how to best help trafficking
survivors overcome their adversity through services such as counseling, job assistance,
financial assistance, family reunification, and housing. However, there are few evidence-based
practices for how to best care for trafficking survivors due to transitory contact
between survivors and care providers, a lack of organizational capacity for research,
and the need to not withhold potentially beneficial treatment from any survivor. In
2018, the United States Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons suggested
that one best practice is using trauma-informed care (TIC) due to survivors’ likelihood
of having experienced complex trauma. This study examines 18 anti-trafficking organization
employees’ perceptions and use of TIC in the treatment of trafficking survivors through
interviews. A meta-analysis of research about the best practices of meeting the mental
health needs of survivors shows in what ways providers using TIC to meet survivors’
mental health needs are not flying blind, but rather using evidence-based practices.
A meta-analysis of research about the mental health needs of trafficking survivors
is used to further develop providers’ understanding of survivors’ mental health needs
and identify areas for further research.
Type
Honors thesisPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17923Citation
Downey, Cara (2018). Flying Blind? Implementing a Trauma-Informed Care Approach in the Treatment of Trafficking
Survivors. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17923.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info