Clean Water Act jurisdiction for Little Sycamore Wash, Arizona: Hydrologic connectivity and changing federal regulatory interpretation in the arid western U.S.
Abstract
Infrequent streamflow in arid landscapes presents challenges for determining Clean
Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. Because of such uncertainty, Freeport McMoRan (Freeport)
– the second-largest copper producer worldwide – requested an assessment of possible
federal jurisdiction for Little Sycamore Wash, a headwater tributary, in Arizona.
CWA jurisdiction depends on the definition of “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS),
which has been widely interpreted and continuously litigated nationwide. Mining activities
impacting the wash would be federally regulated only if it is a WOTUS (referred to
here as jurisdictional water) or there is evidence of hydrologic connectivity to a
jurisdictional water.
Over the past 40 years, courts and agency interpretation and guidance have shaped
the definition of WOTUS, making the scope of jurisdiction broader and narrower as
practice changed. Currently there are three definitions of jurisdictional waters that
are relevant: 1) pre-2015 practice, shaped primarily by guidances issued by EPA and
USACE following Supreme Court cases in the 2000s, 2) the 2015 Obama administration
Clean Water Rule (2015 CWR), which broadened the scope of jurisdiction in some cases
and aimed to clarify questions of jurisdiction, and 3) the 2019 Trump administration
proposed rule (2019 proposed rule), which takes a narrower view of jurisdiction. Due
to a complex legal landscape, some parts of the U.S. are subject to pre-2015 practice
and some are subject to the 2015 CWR. The 2019 proposed rule is being developed into
a final rule as of April 2019, and therefore will also become relevant. Because of
these complexities, the jurisdictional status of Little Sycamore Wash depends on which
definition is in place.
Furthermore, the way jurisdictional waters are defined in arid landscapes can be problematic,
as regulation and practice were generally developed based on humid landscape characteristics
and associated assumptions. Physical indicators of channel form, such as Ordinary
High Water Mark (OHWM), are not necessarily representative of the same flow regimes
in humid and arid landscapes. Because of these difficulties, we use physical flow
connectivity to determine possible jurisdiction.
A standard, simplified flow routing model (HEC-HMS) is used to quantify the probability
of continuous hydrologic connectivity along the arid stream river network to the closest
Traditionally Navigable Water (Santa Maria River to outlet at Alamo Lake by proxy).
Modeling results indicate that there is a low level of hydrologic connectivity via
stream flow during storm events. When three of the major headwater sub-basins of
the Santa Maria experience simultaneous 10-year frequency storms, the river does not
discharge to its outlet under realistic field conditions. Based on these results,
we estimate that it is unlikely that there is continuous hydrologic connectivity more
than once a decade to downstream jurisdictional waters. Based on this lack of connectivity,
the wash is unlikely to be considered jurisdictional under past, present, or anticipated
future definitions of WOTUS.
The study area is unlikely to be deemed jurisdictional by any version of the rule
analyzed or proposed. In order to be jurisdictional Little Sycamore Wash would have
to meet these qualifications:
1) Pre-2015 practice: Ephemeral streams are jurisdictional depending on a significant
nexus test, which consists of case-by-case determination of whether flow function
significantly affects chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the TNW (this
is current Arizona practice as of April 2019).
2) 2015 CWR: If flow of the wash contributes flow directly or indirectly to a TNW
and the wash is indicated by physical markers of bed, bank, and OHWM.
3) 2019 proposed rule: If the wash is flowing during the wet time of year or flowing
continuously during a typical year.
Arizona is in the process of developing a state program to assume administration of
the 404 program. They are in the middle of a stakeholder engagement process. They
formed technical working groups on a variety of topics, including Jurisdictional Determinations
and the Permits Process. The working groups have written white papers focusing on
their technical area with an analysis of the current state, ideal future state, and
gaps between the two. Arizona state law requires that the program, if assumed by the
state, be no more stringent than the federal program; federal law requires regulation
to be no less stringent in states than in the federal government. This would leave
Arizona’s 404 program exactly the same as federal environmental regulation, and the
only aspect that may change for the regulated community is the party to which applications
are submitted. Therefore, regardless of whether and how specifically Arizona decides
to assume the program, the jurisdictional status of Little Sycamore Wash is unlikely
to change.
Although it is not likely that Little Sycamore Wash is a jurisdictional water, Freeport
would benefit by investing in additional monitoring gauges to obtain a more accurate
depiction of physical hydrologic connectivity in the Santa Maria watershed. This would
allow Freeport to make the strongest possible case for whether the wash should be
considered jurisdictional and avoid regulatory uncertainty. Freeport should also monitor
the Arizona 404 assumption process to stay abreast of any developments that may impact
their operations in this uncertain regulatory and political climate.
Type
Master's projectSubject
WOTUSClean Water Act
Arid Landscape
Hydraulic Modeling
Clean Water Act Section 404
Waters of the United States
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18457Citation
Landes, Laura; Meyer, Christopher; Muzzy, Laurie; & Yeh, Sara (2019). Clean Water Act jurisdiction for Little Sycamore Wash, Arizona: Hydrologic connectivity
and changing federal regulatory interpretation in the arid western U.S. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18457.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info