Show simple item record

The Privatization of Protection: The Neoliberal Fourteenth Amendment

dc.contributor.advisor Hardt, Michael
dc.contributor.advisor Wiegman, Robyn
dc.contributor.author Blalock, Corinne
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-07T19:49:17Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-21T08:17:15Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18786
dc.description Dissertation
dc.description.abstract <p>This dissertation, “The Privatization of Protection: The Neoliberal Fourteenth Amendment” examines how the importation of private law and free market frameworks into public law have reshaped the Supreme Court’s understanding of equality and due process in areas as diverse as international arbitration, access to abortion, and affirmative action. My research draws on both legal and critical theory methods, reading studies of political economy alongside analysis of doctrinal and historical sources, to explore how the rhetoric of the market transforms and limits the ways we imagine our society and the role of government in it. This dissertation traces how the embrace of the models of efficiency, choice, and human capital by both liberal and conservative justices alike has eroded the law’s protective role. Equal protection and due process have been redefined according to the needs, logics, and limits of the market with consequences disproportionately borne by the poor and working class.</p>
dc.subject Law
dc.subject critical theory
dc.subject fourteenth amendment
dc.subject law
dc.subject neoliberalism
dc.subject supreme court
dc.title The Privatization of Protection: The Neoliberal Fourteenth Amendment
dc.type Dissertation
dc.department Literature
duke.embargo.months 23


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record