Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.].
Type
Journal articleSubject
STREAMLINE COLON InvestigatorsSTREAMLINE LUNG Investigators
METRIC Investigators
MASTERMIND consortium
MASTERMIND consortium
Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
CTC-STOP protocol development group
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18956Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1186/s41512-017-0011-4Publication Info
(2017). Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers. Diagnostic and prognostic research, 1(1). pp. 11. 10.1186/s41512-017-0011-4. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18956.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item record
Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator, and subject.
-
Above-ground biomass and structure of 260 African tropical forests.
(Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013-01)We report above-ground biomass (AGB), basal area, stem density and wood mass density estimates from 260 sample plots (mean size: 1.2 ha) in intact closed-canopy tropical forests across 12 African countries. Mean AGB is 395.7 ... -
Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.
(European heart journal, 2019-02)AIMS:There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and ... -
Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.
(Cell death and differentiation, 2018-03)Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the ...
