An Efficient Pseudo-likelihood Method for Sparse Binary Pairwise Markov Network Estimation
Repository Usage Stats
71
views
views
20
downloads
downloads
Abstract
The pseudo-likelihood method is one of the most popular algorithms for
learning sparse binary pairwise Markov networks. In this paper, we formulate
the $L_1$ regularized pseudo-likelihood problem as a sparse multiple logistic
regression problem. In this way, many insights and optimization procedures for
sparse logistic regression can be applied to the learning of discrete Markov
networks. Specifically, we use the coordinate descent algorithm for generalized
linear models with convex penalties, combined with strong screening rules, to
solve the pseudo-likelihood problem with $L_1$ regularization. Therefore a
substantial speedup without losing any accuracy can be achieved. Furthermore,
this method is more stable than the node-wise logistic regression approach on
unbalanced high-dimensional data when penalized by small regularization
parameters. Thorough numerical experiments on simulated data and real world
data demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19037Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
David Page
James B. Duke Distinguished Professor
David Page works on algorithms for data mining and machine learning, as well as their
applications to biomedical data, especially de-identified electronic health records
and high-throughput genetic and other molecular data. Of particular interest are machine
learning methods for complex multi-relational data (such as electronic health records
or molecules as shown) and irregular temporal data, and methods that find causal relationships
or produce human-interpretable output (such as the rules for

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info