Missing Data in the Unified Dysksinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS).
Abstract
Identify the number of allowable missing values still permitting valid surrogate score
calculation for the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS). Missing data frequently
occur in Parkinson's disease rating scales, and they compromise data validity, risking
data exclusion from final analyses. Accessing the International Parkinson and Movement
Disorder Society-sponsored UDysRS translation databases (3313 complete scores). We
sequentially removed item scores, consistently or randomly from subjective and objective
sections. Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient compared prorated scores with
complete scores. We considered prorated scores valid when Coefficients exceeded 0.95.
For consistently missing items, three from the subjective section and five from the
objective section are allowable. For randomly missing items, seven from the subjective
section and four from the objective section are permissible. We provide guidelines
for constructing valid surrogate summary UDysRS scores with clear thresholds for retaining
or rejecting scores based on missing values.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19153Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1002/mdc3.12642Publication Info
Luo, Sheng; Ren, Xuehan; Han, Weilu; Goetz, Christopher G; & Stebbins, Glenn T (2018). Missing Data in the Unified Dysksinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS). Movement disorders clinical practice, 5(5). pp. 523-526. 10.1002/mdc3.12642. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19153.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Sheng Luo
Professor of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info