ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Are mature smokers misinformed?
Abstract
While there are many reasons to continue to smoke in spite of its consequences for
health, the concern that many smoke because they misperceive the risks of smoking
remains a focus of public discussion and motivates tobacco control policies and litigation.
In this paper we investigate the relative accuracy of mature smokers' risk perceptions
about future survival, and a range of morbidities and disabilities. Using data from
the survey on smoking (SOS) conducted for this research, we compare subjective beliefs
elicited from the SOS with corresponding individual-specific objective probabilities
estimated from the health and retirement study. Overall, consumers in the age group
studied, 50-70, are not overly optimistic in their perceptions of health risk. If
anything, smokers tend to be relatively pessimistic about these risks. The finding
that smokers are either well informed or pessimistic regarding a broad range of health
risks suggests that these beliefs are not pivotal in the decision to continue smoking.
Although statements by the tobacco companies may have been misleading and thus encouraged
some to start smoking, we find no evidence that systematic misinformation about the
health consequences of smoking inhibits quitting.
Type
Journal articleSubject
AgedDeception
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Surveys
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Assessment
Smoking
United States
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/1948Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.12.004Publication Info
Khwaja, Ahmed; Silverman, Dan; Sloan, Frank; & Wang, Yang (2009). Are mature smokers misinformed?. J Health Econ, 28(2). pp. 385-397. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.12.004. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/1948.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item record
Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info