Show simple item record

Detrending and business cycle facts: A comment

dc.contributor.author Burnside, C
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-09T15:36:38Z
dc.date.issued 1998-05-20
dc.identifier.issn 0304-3932
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/1979
dc.description.abstract There is nothing misleading in the fact that different filtering techniques lead to different facts about macroeconomic time series. The fact that economists use a large number of filters to extract the 'cyclical' and 'trend' components of time series simply means that these concepts do not have unique meaning among them. Alternative filters provide different windows through which economists can examine their models and data. It is an open question as to whether some of these windows are more or less interesting to look through. The fact that some economists restrict themselves to a small set of filters is an issue to the extent that they thereby induce a lack of power. Here, I argue that a commonly used method of testing business cycle models induces no such lack of power.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Monetary Economics
dc.title Detrending and business cycle facts: A comment
dc.type Journal article
pubs.begin-page 513
pubs.end-page 532
pubs.issue 3
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Economics
pubs.organisational-group Trinity College of Arts & Sciences
pubs.publication-status Published
pubs.volume 41


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record