Using a health information technology survey to explore the availability of addiction treatment data in the electronic health records: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Healthcare data from electronic health records (EHRs) and related health
information technology (IT) tools are critical data sources for pragmatic clinical
trials and observational studies aimed at producing real-world evidence. To unlock
the full potential of such data to advance science, the data must be complete and
in structured formats to facilitate research use. METHODS:A Health IT survey was conducted
within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) to explore
information related to data completeness and presence of unstructured data (e.g.,
clinical notes, free text) for conducting the EHR-based research for substance use
disorders (SUDs). The analysis was based on 36 participants from 36 facilities located
in 14 states and affiliated with the CTN. RESULTS:The mean age of the participants
(n = 34) was 48.0 years (SD = 9.8). Of the participants enrolled, 50.0% were female
and 82.4% were white. Participants' facilities were from four census-defined regions
(South 35.3%, Northeast 29.4%, West 20.6%, Midwest 11.8%, Missing 2.9%) and represented
diverse settings. The EHR was used by all surveyed facilities including 17 different
kinds of EHR platforms or vendors, and 17.6% (n = 6) of surveyed facilities also used
a separate EHR for behavioral health care (e.g., SUD care). Paper records were also
used by 76.5% of surveyed facilities for clinical care (e.g., for health risk appraisal
questionnaires, substance use screening or assessment, check-in screening, substance
use specific intervention/treatment or referral, or labs/testing). The prevalence
of using a patient portal, practice management system, and mHealth for patient care
was 76.5%, 50.0%, and 29.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION:While results are descriptive
in nature, they reveal the heterogeneity in the existing EHRs and frequent use of
paper records to document patient care tasks, especially for SUD care. The use of
a separate EHR for behavioral healthcare also suggests the challenge of obtaining
complete EHR data to support research for SUDs. Much EHR development, integration,
and standardization needs to be done especially in regard to SUD treatment to facilitate
research across disparate healthcare systems.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Clinical Trials NetworkCommon data elements
Electronic health records
Health information technology
Substance use disorder
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20354Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.015Publication Info
Wu, Li-Tzy; Payne, Elizabeth H; Roseman, Kimberly; Case, Ashley; Nelson, Casey; &
Lindblad, Robert (2020). Using a health information technology survey to explore the availability of addiction
treatment data in the electronic health records: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical
Trials Network study. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 112S. pp. 56-62. 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.015. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20354.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Li-Tzy Wu
Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Education/Training: Pre- and post-doctoral training in mental health service research,
psychiatric epidemiology (NIMH T32), and addiction epidemiology (NIDA T32) from Johns
Hopkins University School of Public Health (Maryland); Fellow of the NIH Summer Institute
on the Design and Conduct of Randomized Clinical Trials.Director: Duke Community Based
Substance Use Disorder Research Program.Research interests: COVID-19, Opioid misuse,
Opioid overdose, Opioid use disorder

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info