Show simple item record

Using a health information technology survey to explore the availability of addiction treatment data in the electronic health records: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.

dc.contributor.author Wu, Li-Tzy
dc.contributor.author Payne, Elizabeth H
dc.contributor.author Roseman, Kimberly
dc.contributor.author Case, Ashley
dc.contributor.author Nelson, Casey
dc.contributor.author Lindblad, Robert
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-01T22:33:34Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-01T22:33:34Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03
dc.identifier S0740-5472(19)30399-X
dc.identifier.issn 0740-5472
dc.identifier.issn 1873-6483
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20354
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND:Healthcare data from electronic health records (EHRs) and related health information technology (IT) tools are critical data sources for pragmatic clinical trials and observational studies aimed at producing real-world evidence. To unlock the full potential of such data to advance science, the data must be complete and in structured formats to facilitate research use. METHODS:A Health IT survey was conducted within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) to explore information related to data completeness and presence of unstructured data (e.g., clinical notes, free text) for conducting the EHR-based research for substance use disorders (SUDs). The analysis was based on 36 participants from 36 facilities located in 14 states and affiliated with the CTN. RESULTS:The mean age of the participants (n = 34) was 48.0 years (SD = 9.8). Of the participants enrolled, 50.0% were female and 82.4% were white. Participants' facilities were from four census-defined regions (South 35.3%, Northeast 29.4%, West 20.6%, Midwest 11.8%, Missing 2.9%) and represented diverse settings. The EHR was used by all surveyed facilities including 17 different kinds of EHR platforms or vendors, and 17.6% (n = 6) of surveyed facilities also used a separate EHR for behavioral health care (e.g., SUD care). Paper records were also used by 76.5% of surveyed facilities for clinical care (e.g., for health risk appraisal questionnaires, substance use screening or assessment, check-in screening, substance use specific intervention/treatment or referral, or labs/testing). The prevalence of using a patient portal, practice management system, and mHealth for patient care was 76.5%, 50.0%, and 29.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION:While results are descriptive in nature, they reveal the heterogeneity in the existing EHRs and frequent use of paper records to document patient care tasks, especially for SUD care. The use of a separate EHR for behavioral healthcare also suggests the challenge of obtaining complete EHR data to support research for SUDs. Much EHR development, integration, and standardization needs to be done especially in regard to SUD treatment to facilitate research across disparate healthcare systems.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of substance abuse treatment
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.015
dc.subject Clinical Trials Network
dc.subject Common data elements
dc.subject Electronic health records
dc.subject Health information technology
dc.subject Substance use disorder
dc.title Using a health information technology survey to explore the availability of addiction treatment data in the electronic health records: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.
dc.type Journal article
duke.contributor.id Wu, Li-Tzy|0380644
dc.date.updated 2020-04-01T22:33:33Z
pubs.begin-page 56
pubs.end-page 62
pubs.organisational-group School of Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Center for Child and Family Policy
pubs.organisational-group Duke Clinical Research Institute
pubs.organisational-group Duke Institute for Brain Sciences
pubs.organisational-group Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Social and Community Psychiatry
pubs.organisational-group Medicine, General Internal Medicine
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Sanford School of Public Policy
pubs.organisational-group Institutes and Centers
pubs.organisational-group University Institutes and Centers
pubs.organisational-group Institutes and Provost's Academic Units
pubs.organisational-group Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
pubs.organisational-group Clinical Science Departments
pubs.organisational-group Medicine
pubs.publication-status Published
pubs.volume 112S
duke.contributor.orcid Wu, Li-Tzy|0000-0002-5909-2259


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record