dc.contributor.author |
Hoover, KD |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-03-09T15:42:24Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-11-01 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0165-0106 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/2043 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The dominant view among macroeconomists is that macroeconomics reduces to microeconomics,
both in the sense that all macroeconomic phenomena arise out of microeconomic phenomena
and in the sense that macroeconomic theory-to the extent that it is correct-can be
derived from microeconomic theory. More than that, the dominant view believes that
macroeconomics should in practice use the reduced microeconomic theory: this is the
program of microfoundations for macroeconomics to which the vast majority of macroeconomists
adhere. The "microfoundational" models that they actually employ are, however, characterized
by another feature: they are highly idealized, even when they are applied as direct
characterizations of actual data, which itself consists of macroeconomic aggregates.
This paper explores the interrelationship between reductionism and idealization in
the microfoundational program and the role of idealization in empirical modeling.
© 2010 The Author(s).
|
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
|
dc.publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Erkenntnis |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1007/s10670-010-9235-1 |
|
dc.title |
Idealizing Reduction: The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics |
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Hoover, KD|0407659 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
329 |
|
pubs.end-page |
347 |
|
pubs.issue |
3 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Economics |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Philosophy |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Trinity College of Arts & Sciences |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
73 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
1572-8420 |
|