ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Environmental Justice Analysis of Post-Hurricane Funding and Planning
Abstract
As disasters increase in frequency and severity with climate change, affected communities
across the United States are struggling to recover in a timely manner. Through analysis
of federal and state recovery funds and semi-structured interviews with state and
local stakeholders, our project examined how rural communities in North Carolina are
accessing recovery funds following hurricanes Matthew and Florence. Results show that
barriers to hurricane recovery are procedural, informational, financial, and cultural
in nature. Additionally, stakeholders identified numerous strategies for community
members to build resilience in their communities throughout the post-hurricane funding
and planning process. Generally, effective resilience strategies fell into three distinct
groups which encompassed all phases of the hurricane planning process: expanded pre-disaster
planning, building relationships and trust, and partnerships with local organizations.
Our research highlighted actionable steps that can be taken to address issues in the
current hurricane recovery funding framework.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20481Citation
Zhao, Alicia; Cornish, Kyle; & Gonsenhauser, Rachel (2020). Environmental Justice Analysis of Post-Hurricane Funding and Planning. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20481.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info