A Case Study of Community Solar’s Impact on the Energy Affordability of Minnesota’s Low to Moderate Income households
Abstract
Community solar gardens have been adopted by many states in the United States of America.
They are an innovative way for utility ratepayers to have a direct role in the energy
transition and support deployment of solar power onto the grid. However, the renewable
energy industry has been criticized for the lack of low-to-moderate income household
participation. To examine this further, I analyzed the participation rate of low-to-moderate
income households in a sample set of Minnesota community solar subscriber data. This
was achieved by translating the threshold for low-to-moderate income households to
a housing price value. Furthermore, a model was created to assess the financial impact
of various community solar tariffs on all the stakeholders involved. Analysis of data
from 306 credit scores and 185 addresses of community solar garden subscribers showed
that even with a credit score minimum requirement, almost 31% of subscribers were
low-to-moderate income households. The results of the model showed that non-subscribing
ratepayers pay at least 5% more in annual utility bills than subscribers, regardless
of their income level. I also found that utilities and developers have competing interests
when setting community solar tariffs, even after the Value of Solar was implemented.
Overall, these findings support the low-to-moderate income ratepayer advocates and
arguments for community solar reform.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20534Citation
Jung, Annie (2020). A Case Study of Community Solar’s Impact on the Energy Affordability of Minnesota’s
Low to Moderate Income households. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20534.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info