Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.
Abstract
The perception of visual motion is dependent on a set of occipitotemporal regions
that are readily accessible to neuromodulation. The current study tested if paired-pulse
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ppTMS) could modulate motion perception by stimulating
the occipital cortex as participants viewed near-threshold motion dot stimuli. In
this sham-controlled study, fifteen subjects completed two sessions. On the first
visit, resting motor threshold (RMT) was assessed, and participants performed an adaptive
direction discrimination task to determine individual motion sensitivity. During the
second visit, subjects performed the task with three difficulty levels as TMS pulses
were delivered 150 and 50 ms prior to motion stimulus onset at 120% RMT, under the
logic that the cumulative inhibitory effect of these pulses would alter motion sensitivity.
ppTMS was delivered at one of two locations: 3 cm dorsal and 5 cm lateral to inion
(scalp-based coordinate), or at the site of peak activation for "motion" according
to the NeuroSynth fMRI database (meta-analytic coordinate). Sham stimulation was delivered
on one-third of trials by tilting the coil 90°. Analyses showed no significant active-versus-sham
effects of ppTMS when stimulation was delivered to the meta-analytic (p = 0.15) or
scalp-based coordinates (p = 0.17), which were separated by 29 mm on average. Active-versus-sham
stimulation differences did not interact with either stimulation location (p = 0.12)
or difficulty (p = 0.33). These findings fail to support the hypothesis that long-interval
ppTMS recruits inhibitory processes in motion-sensitive cortex but must be considered
within the limited parameters used in this design.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20695Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135022Publication Info
Gamboa, Olga Lucia; Brito, Alexandra; Abzug, Zachary; D'Arbeloff, Tracy; Beynel, Lysianne;
Wing, Erik A; ... Appelbaum, Lawrence G (2020). Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive
visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination. Neuroscience letters. pp. 135022. 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135022. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20695.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Lawrence Gregory Appelbaum
Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Greg Appelbaum is an Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences in the Duke University School of Medicine. Dr. Appelbaum's research
interests primarily concern the brain mechanisms underlying visual cognition, how
these capabilities differ among individuals, and how they can be improved through
behavioral, neurofeedback, and neuromodulation interventions. Within the field of
cognitive neuroscience, his research has addressed visual pe
Roberto Cabeza
Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
My laboratory investigates the neural correlates of memory and cognition in young
and older adults using fMRI. We have three main lines of research: First, we distinguish
the neural correlates of various episodic memory processes. For example, we have compared
encoding vs. retrieval, item vs. source memory, recall vs. recognition, true vs. false
memory, and emotional vs. nonemotional memory. We are particularly interested in the
contribution of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and medial temporal lobe (M
Simon Wilton Davis
Assistant Professor in Neurology
My research centers around the use of structural and functional imaging measures to
study the shifts in network architecture in the aging brain. I am specifically interested
in changes in how changes in structural and functional connectivity associated with
aging impact the semantic retrieval of word or fact knowledge. Currently this involves
asking why older adults have particular difficulty in certain kinds of semantic retrieval,
despite the fact that vocabularies and knowledge stores typic
Angel V Peterchev
Associate Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
I direct the Brain Stimulation Engineering Lab (BSEL) which focuses on the development,
modeling, and application of devices and paradigms for transcranial brain stimulation.
Transcranial brain stimulation involves non-invasive delivery of fields (e.g., electric
and magnetic) to the brain that modulate neural activity. It is widely used as a tool
for research and a therapeutic intervention in neurology and psychiatry, including
several FDA-cleared indications. BSEL develops novel technology s
Marc A. Sommer
W. H. Gardner, Jr. Associate Professor
We study circuits for cognition. Using a combination of neurophysiology and biomedical
engineering, we focus on the interaction between brain areas during visual perception,
decision-making, and motor planning. Specific projects include the role of frontal
cortex in metacognition, the role of cerebellar-frontal circuits in action timing,
the neural basis of "good enough" decision-making (satisficing), and the neural mechanisms
of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info