How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk: Comment
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, Tracy R | |
dc.contributor.author | Sappington, David EM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-09T15:44:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-09T15:44:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10161/2096 | |
dc.description.abstract | In a previously published article in this Review, Rohan Pitchford (1995) develops an interesting model of lender liability and derives an intriguing finding. He shows that when lenders are held liable for the social damages that arise from the actitives of a judgment-proof producer expected social damages may increase not decrease .................... | |
dc.format.extent | 2708206 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | American Economic Association | |
dc.subject | lender liability | |
dc.title | How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk: Comment | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.id | Lewis, Tracy R|0288071 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Scholarly Articles
Articles