PROPHETIC: Prospective Identification of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Pneumonia is the leading infection-related cause of death. Using simple
clinical criteria and contemporary epidemiology to identify patients at high risk
of nosocomial pneumonia should enhance prevention efforts and facilitate development
of new treatments in clinical trials. RESEARCH QUESTION:What are the clinical criteria
and contemporary epidemiology trends helpful in identifying patients at high risk
of nosocomial pneumonia? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Within the intensive care units
of 28 United States hospitals, we conducted a prospective cohort study among adults
hospitalized more than 48 hours and considered high risk for pneumonia (defined as
treatment with invasive or noninvasive ventilatory support or high levels of supplemental
oxygen). We estimated the proportion of high-risk patients developing nosocomial pneumonia.
Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient characteristics and
treatment exposures associated with increased risk of pneumonia development during
the intensive care unit admission. RESULTS:Between February 6, 2016 and October 7,
2016, 4613 high-risk patients were enrolled. Among 1464/4613 (32%) high-risk patients
treated for possible nosocomial pneumonia, 537/1464 (37%) met the study pneumonia
definition. Among high-risk patients, a multivariable logistic model was developed
to identify key patient characteristics and treatment exposures associated with increased
risk of nosocomial pneumonia development (c-statistic 0.709, 95% confidence interval
0.686 to 0.731). Key factors associated with increased odds of nosocomial pneumonia
included an admission diagnosis of trauma or cerebrovascular accident, receipt of
enteral nutrition, documented aspiration risk, and receipt of systemic antibacterials
within the preceding 90 days. INTERPRETATION:Treatment for nosocomial pneumonia is
common among intensive care unit patients receiving high levels of respiratory support,
yet more than half of patients treated do not fulfill standard diagnostic criteria
for pneumonia. Application of simple clinical criteria may improve the feasibility
of clinical trials of pneumonia prevention and treatment by facilitating prospective
identification of patients at highest risk.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21267Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.034Publication Info
Bergin, Stephen P; Coles, Adrian; Calvert, Sara B; Farley, John; Powers, John H; Zervos,
Marcus J; ... Holland, Thomas L (2020). PROPHETIC: Prospective Identification of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients in the
Intensive Care Unit. Chest. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.034. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21267.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Stephen Patrick Bergin
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Karen Chiswell
Statistical Scientist
Ph.D., North Carolina State University - 2007I work closely with clinical and quantitative
colleagues to provide statistical leadership, guidance and mentoring on the design, execution,
and analysis of clinical research studies. My work includes design and analysis of
observational studies (including large cardiovascular registries, and clinical care
databases linke
Vance Garrison Fowler Jr.
Florence McAlister Distinguished Professor of Medicine
Determinants of Outcome in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Antibacterial
ResistancePathogenesis of Bacterial Infections Tropical medicine/International Health
Thomas Lawrence Holland
Associate Professor of Medicine
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info