The War Scare That Wasn't: Able Archer 83 and the Myths of the Second Cold War
Abstract
<jats:p> Did the Cold War of the 1980s nearly turn hot? Much has been made of the
November 1983 Able Archer 83 command-post exercise, which is often described as having
nearly precipitated a nuclear war when paranoid Warsaw Pact policymakers suspected
that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was using the exercise to launch
a preemptive nuclear strike. This article challenges that narrative, using new evidence
from the archives of the former Warsaw Pact countries. It shows that the much-touted
intelligence effort to assess Western intentions and capabilities, Project RYaN, which
supposedly triggered fears of a surprise attack, was nowhere near operational at the
time of Able Archer 83. It also presents an account of the Pact's sanguine observations
of Able Archer 83. In doing so, it advances key debates in the historiography of the
late Cold War pertaining to the stability and durability of the nuclear peace. </jats:p>
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21419Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1162/jcws_a_00952Publication Info
Miles, Simon (2020). The War Scare That Wasn't: Able Archer 83 and the Myths of the Second Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 22(3). pp. 86-118. 10.1162/jcws_a_00952. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21419.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Simon Miles
Assistant Professor in the Sanford School of Public Policy
Simon Miles joined the faculty of the Sanford School of Public Policy as an Assistant
Professor in 2017. He is a diplomatic historian whose research agenda explores the
causes and mechanics of cooperation between states.His first book, Engaging the Evil
Empire: Washington, Moscow and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War, explores
the root causes of c

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info