Legislative and Regulatory Steps for a National COVID-19 Testing Strategy

Date
2020-08-05
Authors
McClellan, Mark
Rivers, Caitlin
Silcox, Christina
Repository Usage Stats
83
views
20
downloads
Abstract
The Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy report, “Legislative and Regulatory Steps for a National COVID-19 Testing Strategy,” outlines legislative actions and federal appropriation targets that Duke-Margolis and its collaborating experts believe are needed to get a robust, diversified testing strategy in place for the nation by fall 2020.
Type
Report
Subject
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
COVID-19 Legislative Strategy
COVID-19 Appropriation Recommendations for Testing
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21541
Citation
McClellan, Mark; Rivers, Caitlin; & Silcox, Christina (2020). Legislative and Regulatory Steps for a National COVID-19 Testing Strategy. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21541.
Collections
More Info
Show full item record

Scholars@Duke

McClellan

Mark B McClellan

Professor of the Practice of Business Administration
Mark McClellan, MD, PhD, is a physician-economist who focuses on quality and value in health care, including payment and coverage reform, real-world evidence, more effective policies to support drug and device innovation, and initiatives to increase the impact of health care, public health, and social service programs on population health. His work on responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency spanned virus containment and testing strategies, reforming health care toward more resilien

Christina Silcox

Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.

Rights for Collection: Research and Writings

Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info