ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are associated
with decreased health-related quality of life and debilitating symptoms. These experiences
can be defined as patient-reported outcome (PRO) concepts and measured using PRO instruments.
We identified all PRO concepts and instruments used in the PBC and PSC literature.
This systematic review identified PBC and/or PSC studies from January 1, 1990, to
May 6, 2019, that measured at least one PRO concept. Study population, design, PRO
concept, PRO instrument, and validation data for PRO instruments were investigated.
We provided descriptive statistics of PRO concepts and instruments used, stratified
by population type. Use of PRO concepts and instruments were assessed over time. The
search yielded 318 articles (69% in PBC, 18% in PSC, 13% in both, and 24% in drug
trials). Forty-nine unique PRO concepts were identified. The five most common PRO
concepts included pruritus (25%), fatigue (19%), broad health-related quality of life
(16%), gastrointestinal adverse events (6%), and physical adverse events (6%). Only
60% of PRO concepts were measured with a PRO instrument, most of which were nonvalidated
visual analogue or numeric rating scales. Only three of 83 PRO instruments were developed
with feedback from the target populations (one for PBC, one for PSC, and one for both),
and only six documented any psychometric testing in the target populations. Use of
PRO instruments increased over time from 30% in the 1990s to 67% by 2019. Conclusion:
The overwhelming majority of PRO instruments used in PBC/PSC were nonspecific and
lacked patient validation or empirical justification. Significant opportunities exist
to use qualitative methods to better understand patient experiences, and translate
this knowledge into meaningful, patient-driven study outcomes.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21635Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1002/hep4.1567Publication Info
Kim, Hannah P; Lieber, Sarah R; Rogers, Michael E; Moon, Andrew M; Loiselle, Marci;
Walker, Jennifer; ... Evon, Donna M (2020). A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Biliary Cholangitis and
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Hepatology communications, 4(10). pp. 1502-1515. 10.1002/hep4.1567. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21635.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Marci M Loiselle
Associate Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info