Do asexual polyploid lineages lead short evolutionary lives? A case study from the fern genus Astrolepis.
Abstract
A life-history transition to asexuality is typically viewed as leading to a heightened
extinction risk, and a number of studies have evaluated this claim by examining the
relative ages of asexual versus closely related sexual lineages. Surprisingly, a rigorous
assessment of the age of an asexual plant lineage has never been published, although
asexuality is extraordinarily common among plants. Here, we estimate the ages of sexual
diploids and asexual polyploids in the fern genus Astrolepis using a well-supported
plastid phylogeny and a relaxed-clock dating approach. The 50 asexual polyploid samples
we included were conservatively estimated to comprise 19 distinct lineages, including
a variety of auto- and allopolyploid genomic combinations. All were either the same
age or younger than the crown group comprising their maternal sexual-diploid parents
based simply on their phylogenetic position. Node ages estimated with the relaxed-clock
approach indicated that the average maximum age of asexual lineages was 0.4 My, and
individual lineages were on average 7 to 47 times younger than the crown- and total-ages
of their sexual parents. Although the confounding association between asexuality and
polyploidy precludes definite conclusions regarding the effect of asexuality, our
results suggest that asexuality limits evolutionary potential in Astrolepis.
Type
Journal articleSubject
PlastidsPteridaceae
Bayes Theorem
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Evolution, Molecular
Phylogeny
Reproduction, Asexual
Polyploidy
Models, Genetic
Extinction, Biological
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21794Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01362.xPublication Info
Beck, JB; Windham, MD; & Pryer, KM (2011). Do asexual polyploid lineages lead short evolutionary lives? A case study from the
fern genus Astrolepis. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 65(11). pp. 3217-3229. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01362.x. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21794.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Kathleen M. Pryer
Professor of Biology

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info