Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas.
Abstract
<h4>Objective</h4>As cases of COVID-19 infections surge, concerns have renewed about
intensive care units (ICUs) being overwhelmed and the need for specific triage protocols
over winter. This study aimed to help inform triage guidance by exploring the views
of lay people about factors to include in triage decisions.<h4>Design, setting and
participants</h4>Online survey between 29th of May and 22nd of June 2020 based on
hypothetical triage dilemmas. Participants recruited from existing market research
panels, representative of the UK general population. Scenarios were presented in which
a single ventilator is available, and two patients require ICU admission and ventilation.
Patients differed in one of: chance of survival, life expectancy, age, expected length
of treatment, disability and degree of frailty. Respondents were given the option
of choosing one patient to treat or tossing a coin to decide.<h4>Results</h4>Seven
hundred and sixty-three participated. A majority of respondents prioritised patients
who would have a higher chance of survival (72%-93%), longer life expectancy (78%-83%),
required shorter duration of treatment (88%-94%), were younger (71%-79%) or had a
lesser degree of frailty (60%-69%, all p<0.001). Where there was a small difference
between two patients, a larger proportion elected to toss a coin to decide which patient
to treat. A majority (58%-86%) were prepared to withdraw treatment from a patient
in intensive care who had a lower chance of survival than another patient currently
presenting with COVID-19. Respondents also indicated a willingness to give higher
priority to healthcare workers and to patients with young children.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Members
of the UK general public potentially support a broadly utilitarian approach to ICU
triage in the face of overwhelming need. Survey respondents endorsed the relevance
of patient factors currently included in triage guidance, but also factors not currently
included. They supported the permissibility of reallocating treatment in a pandemic.
Type
Journal articleSubject
HumansAttitude to Health
Health Care Rationing
Adult
Middle Aged
Intensive Care Units
Triage
Female
Male
Pandemics
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21951Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045593Publication Info
Wilkinson, Dominic; Zohny, Hazem; Kappes, Andreas; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter; & Savulescu,
Julian (2020). Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the
UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas. BMJ open, 10(12). pp. e045593. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045593. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21951.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
Chauncey Stillman Distinguished Professor of Practical Ethics
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong is Chauncey Stillman Professor of Practical Ethics in the Department
of Philosophy and the Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University. He has secondary
appointments in the Law School and the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience,
and he is core faculty in the Duke Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, the <a href

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info