Anthropology, knowledge-flows and global health.
Abstract
Global health programmes are damaged by blockages in the upward flow of information
from localities and regional centres about realities of professional practice and
about patients' lives and conditions of treatment. Power differentials between local
actors and national or international decision-makers present further obstacles to
effective action. Anthropological research and action, in its most effective current
forms, make important contributions to these issues. This research often continues
over the long term, intensively. It can be multi-sited, studying actors at local,
national and international levels simultaneously. It studies the relative knowledge
and power of impoverished patients and global decision-makers, all within a single
frame. By doing so, anthropological research is capable of providing new and important
insights on the diverse meanings of patient decision-making, informed consent, non-compliance,
public health reporting, the building of political coalitions for health and many
other issues.
Type
Journal articleSubject
HumansHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Public Health
Anthropology, Cultural
Bioethics
World Health
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22132Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1080/17441690903401338Publication Info
Feierman, S; Kleinman, A; Stewart, K; Farmer, D; & Das, V (2010). Anthropology, knowledge-flows and global health. Global public health, 5(2). pp. 122-128. 10.1080/17441690903401338. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22132.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Kearsley A Stewart
Professor of the Practice of Global Health

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info