ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of day, December 12.

Show simple item record

Ecology and the science of small-scale fisheries: A synthetic review of research effort for the Anthropocene

dc.contributor.author Smith, H
dc.contributor.author Garcia Lozano, A
dc.contributor.author Baker, D
dc.contributor.author Blondin, H
dc.contributor.author Hamilton, J
dc.contributor.author Choi, J
dc.contributor.author Basurto, X
dc.contributor.author Silliman, B
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-01T15:08:50Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-01T15:08:50Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02-01
dc.identifier.issn 0006-3207
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22286
dc.description.abstract © 2020 Elsevier Ltd Human-driven changes to aquatic environments threaten small-scale fisheries (SSFs). Ensuring a livable future for SSFs in the Anthropocene requires incorporating ecological knowledge of these diverse multi-species systems beyond the long-standing reliance on populations, a management paradigm adopted from industrial fisheries. Assessing the state of ecological knowledge on SSFs is timely as we enter the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science and Sustainable Development and with the upcoming International Year of Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture. Synthesizing research effort can help identify existing knowledge gaps and relatively well-researched ‘bright spots’ that can inform strategies to achieve global sustainability commitments. Yet trends in ecological research of SSFs are not well understood compared to better-studied industrial fisheries. To address this void, we conducted a synthetic review of SSF publications in ecology journals (n = 302), synthesizing trends in research subjects and methodologies over time. Wide geographic and habitat disparities in the coverage of publications are identified, with marine fisheries in Latin American receiving the greatest coverage while inland and Asian fisheries are understudied relative to the global distribution of SSFs. Bony fish and invertebrates received substantial coverage compared to endangered cartilaginous fishes. Studies have increasingly focused on human dimensions and ecosystem ecology compared to earlier emphasis on population ecology. Methodologically, studies rarely incorporate experiments despite their efficacy in testing interventions. To achieve a ‘wider view’ of fisheries that is reflective of the needs of SSFs in the Anthropocene, future ecological studies should expand their geographic, taxonomic, and methodological breadth to better assess understudied SSF interactions.
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof Biological Conservation
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108895
dc.title Ecology and the science of small-scale fisheries: A synthetic review of research effort for the Anthropocene
dc.type Journal article
duke.contributor.id Smith, H|0674812
duke.contributor.id Baker, D|0711732
duke.contributor.id Choi, J|0553009
duke.contributor.id Basurto, X|0514089
duke.contributor.id Silliman, B|0213623
dc.date.updated 2021-02-01T15:08:37Z
pubs.organisational-group Nicholas School of the Environment
pubs.organisational-group Marine Science and Conservation
pubs.organisational-group Duke
pubs.organisational-group Student
pubs.organisational-group Environmental Sciences and Policy
pubs.publication-status Accepted
pubs.volume 254
duke.contributor.orcid Smith, H|0000-0003-1746-6942
duke.contributor.orcid Baker, D|0000-0001-8180-3419
duke.contributor.orcid Choi, J|0000-0001-7403-5853
duke.contributor.orcid Basurto, X|0000-0002-5321-3654


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record