ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Multivariable risk scores for predicting short term outcomes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope: a systematic review.
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>Emergency department patients with unexplained syncope are at risk
of experiencing an adverse event within 30 days. Our objective was to systematically
review the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult
syncope patients at high and low risk of an adverse event over the next 30 days.<h4>Methods</h4>We
conducted a systematic review of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase and
CINAHL) from database creation until May 2020. We sought studies evaluating prediction
scores of adults presenting to an emergency department with syncope. We included studies
that followed patients for up to 30 days to identify adverse events such as death,
myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac surgery. We only included studies with a
blinded comparison between baseline clinical features and adverse events. We calculated
likelihood ratios and confidence intervals.<h4>Results</h4>We screened 13,788 abstracts.
We included 17 studies evaluating nine risk stratification scores on 24,234 patient
visits, where 7.5% (95% CI 5.3-10%) experienced an adverse event. A Canadian Syncope
Risk Score of 4 or more was associated with a high likelihood of an adverse event
(LR score=4 or more 11 [95% CI 8.9-14). A Canadian Syncope Risk Score of 0 or less (LR Score = 0 or less 0.10 [95% CI 0.07-0.20]) was associated with a low likelihood of an adverse event.
Other risk scores were not validated on an independent sample, had low positive likelihood
ratios for identifying patients at high risk, or had high negative likelihood ratios
for identifying patients at low risk.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Many risk stratification scores
are not validated or not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. The Canadian Syncope
Risk Score is an accurate validated prediction score for emergency department patients
with unexplained syncope. Its impact on clinical decision making, admission rates,
cost or outcomes of care is not known.
Type
Journal articleSubject
syncope outcomessyncope predictors
syncope risk scores
syncope risk stratification
systematic review
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22322Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/acem.14203Publication Info
Sweanor, Rachel AL; Redelmeier, Robert J; Simel, David L; Albassam, Omar T; Shadowitz,
Steven; & Etchells, Edward E (2020). Multivariable risk scores for predicting short term outcomes for emergency department
patients with unexplained syncope: a systematic review. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency
Medicine. 10.1111/acem.14203. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22322.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
David Lee Simel
Professor Emeritus of Medicine
Chief, Medical Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical CenterAppropriateness of diagnostic
test use, including not just traditional laboratory and radiographic tests, but also
the clinical examination. Editor of the "Rational Clinical Examination Series" published
in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Metaanalysis of diagnostic test
studies

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info