Global Equity Challenges in COVID-19 Vaccine Purchasing
Date
2021-04-21
Author
Advisors
Green, Eric
Yamey, Gavin
Waitzkin, Michael
Repository Usage Stats
356
views
views
231
downloads
downloads
Abstract
A rush to preemptively secure COVID-19 vaccines resulted in high income countries
hoarding an excess supply while low- and middle-income countries are prevented from
equitable access. Previous work on equity in vaccine purchasing has compared cases
per million of COVID-19 to vaccination coverage but does not reflect urgent pressures
placed on healthcare systems. This analysis investigates vaccination coverage against
three measures of COVID-19 burden: deaths per 100,000 population, general hospital
capacity reached, and ICU capacity reached, in order to identify the countries overburdened
and underrepresented in vaccine purchasing. Publicly available data from the Duke
Launch & Scale Speedometer, IHME COVID-19 projections, and Johns Hopkins COVID-19
mortality reports are used for this analysis. While non-high-income countries comprised
64% of this dataset, they represented 93% of countries in ICU crisis, 87% in general
hospital capacity crisis, and 85% in a mortality crisis. This data provides evidence
for the creation of a priority list for equitable global allocation of vaccines to
low- and middle-income countries. High income countries can be incentivized to redistribute
their excess vaccine supplies by reframing measures of pandemic progress away from
nationalistic targets.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
Global Health InstitutePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22611Citation
Raj, Aneesha (2021). Global Equity Challenges in COVID-19 Vaccine Purchasing. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22611.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info